RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

POKE IN THE EYE!

by Steve Fair

 

     The United States National Guard is a state-based military force that becomes part of the U.S. military reserves when activated for federal missions.  The majority of National Guard members hold a civilian job full- time while serving part-time in the Guard.  From the nation's founding until the early 1900s, the U.S. maintained a minimal army and relied on state militias for the majority of military troops.  After the Spanish-American War, Congress was called upon to reform and regulate state militias' training.   In 1903, Congress passed a bill that provides funding for National Guard troops to receive the same training as regular troops.

     National Guard units can be activated for federal active duty during times of war or in the event of a national emergency declared by Congress, the President or the Secretary of Defense.  They can also be activated by a declaration of a state of emergency by the governor in a state.  When the National Guard is not under federal control, the governor in the state is the commander-in-chief for the units in their state.  There are over 443,000 members of the U.S. National Guard.

     In June, President Donald Trump activated 4,000 members of the California National Guard for 60 days to respond to violence in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.  Last week, Trump federalized the National Guard in Portland, Oregon and Chicago, Illinois to help deal with crime in those cities.  Federal courts have repeatedly ruled against Trump's action.  The president has threatened to use the 1807 Insurrection Act if federal courts continue to try and block the Guard deployments.

     On Wednesday 200 members of the Texas National Guard were sent to the Chicago area.  Texas governor Greg Abbott supports the move.  Oklahoma governor Kevin Stitt doesn't.  In an interview with the New York Times, Stitt condemned the deployment of National Guard troops across state lines.  “Oklahomans would lose their mind if Governor Pritzker in Illinois sent troops down to Oklahoma during the Biden administration,” Stitt said.  Three observations:

     First, Trump's action stepped on toes.  Stitt is right-most Okies would go nuts if National Guard troops from a blue state were sent to the Sooner state.  Trump knew using Texans in the Chicago deployment would make the Sand-hillers mad.  While the president has the authority to deploy National Guard troops at his discretion, it would probably have been wise to use the troops from the state of Illinois.  The problem is Illinois Governor Pritzker has avoided dealing with crime in his state and left Trump little choice but to bring in carpetbagger troops.

     Second, Trump's action is divisive.  The president has the authority to activate troops and send them to other states.  Other presidents have done it during times of national emergencies.  President George W. Bush sent National Guard troops from throughout the country to Louisiana during Katrina.   But Trump's action was an intentional poke in Pritzker's eye.  He could have used Illinois troops, but decided otherwise. 

     Third, the federal government is always trying to undermine state rights.  The 10th amendment in the U.S. Constitution says: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  For decades, the federal government usurped the authority of states.  However, since the Supreme Court has taken more 'originalist' interpretation of the Constitution, many issues like abortion and gun control have been pushed back to the states.  Trump's action sends the opposite message.

     Governor Stitt is Chairman of the National Governor's Association (NGA), a non-partisan group.  His remarks were the first criticism about the deployments from a sitting GOP governor.  Several Democratic governors had threatened to leave the group if the NGA did not condemn the interstate use of troops.  Stitt said that wasn't why he spoke against Trump's action.  Stitt is right.  Republicans would have condemned President Biden had he done what President Trump has done.  You shouldn't have rules for thee, but not for me.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD OWN GOVENMENT WASTE!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

PULL THE PLUG!

by Steve Fair

 

     The U.S. federal government shut down October 1st.  Last week, the U.S. Senate took four votes on both Democrat and Republican proposals to fund the government with a Continuing Resolution (CR), but lacked the votes for passage.  After the votes, the Senate adjourned for the weekend.  The U.S. House is scheduled to return to DC on October 14th, but could come back early.      

     During a shutdown, federal employees designated "non-essential," are furloughed.  Essential services like air traffic control and the military are not impacted.  Past shutdowns have resulted in federal employees working without pay during the shutdown, but getting back pay once the shutdown ends.  Social Security payments are expected to continue, as are food stamps and WIC benefits.  Medicare and Medicaid will continue.  The IRS will continue to collect taxes.  Passport processing and services could experience delays.  Oftentimes, the average American doesn't even notice the government is shutdown.  Three observations:

     First, many U.S. federal government functions need to be shut down.  The federal government is notoriously bloated, wasteful and extravagant.  Government agencies spend tax dollars with impunity and no accountability. President Ronald Reagan said, “No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!”  The Trump administration has threatened to permanently layoff some federal workers during this most recent shutdown.  That would be unprecedented.  Does Congress have the political will to pull the plug on wasteful spending?  Time will tell.

     Second, federal government shutdowns are nothing new.  Since 1976, the government has shut down 20 times.  The longest government shutdown happened in 2018 and lasted 34 days.  The current shutdown is happening because Democrats will not support the Republican written CR.  The Ds cite four recent national polls showing Americans will blame President Trump and Republicans for the shutdown more than the Ds.  Sen. Chuck Shumer, (D-NY), said, "Donald Trump and the Republicans own this shutdown."  

     The opportunity to reduce government spending and waste shouldn't be wasted by the GOP.  They should 'own' the shutdown and force Democrats to own the waste.

     Third, Congressional Democrats are putting politics over people.  Holding the federal government hostage to force through a $1.5 trillion dollar wish list of pork is a risky strategy.  Refusing to support the Republican CR to keep the lights on is the height of partisan.  Obstructionism is the failed political scheme that put the Ds are in the Congressional minority.  Expect Congressional Ds to cave quickly because Americans will blame all elected officials, no matter Party, if a shutdown dawdles.

     In 1974, Congress passed a bill revising the budgeting process.  In the 50 years Congress has used the system, only four times have they passed all the required appropriations measures on time.  It wasn't the intent.  Rather than pass individual spending bills, like the '74 bill outlined, Congress has instead used omnibus bills and CRs to fund government.  An omnibus bill bundles 12 annual appropriations bills into a massive spending package and is hundreds of pages long.  It is often passed at the end of a legislative session, in the dark of night.  Tax payers should demand government spending be justified.  If it's not, pull the plug!

OKLAHOMA PUBLIC EDUCATION NEEDS MORE THAN MONEY!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

WALTERS RESIGNATION

by Steve Fair

 

     The Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) was founded in 1991 by Washington state legislator Robert Williams and political operative/consultant Lynn Harsh.  It is a 501c3 organization promoting conservative causes.  In March, the Freedom Foundation started the Teacher Freedom Alliance (TFA).  The TFA is an anti-union organization for teachers that does not engage in collective bargaining with school districts.  It exists to help removing existing teachers’ unions and providing liability insurance for classroom teachers.  Oklahoma already has a similar organization- Public Educators of Oklahoma (POE).  One of the founders of POE- Mike Tinney- is on the state school board.

     On Wednesday on Fox News, Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instructor Ryan Walters announced he will be resigning in October to become the CEO of the Teacher Freedom Alliance.  Three observations:

     First, Oklahoma's public education outcomes remain stagnant.  For years, Oklahoma has lagged behind in education.  The Oklahoma Education Association (OEA) lobbies every year for legislators to increase teacher pay.  They promise if teachers are paid more, test outcomes will improve.  That has yet to happen.  When Ryan Walters was elected, he assured voters he would turn it around.  That didn't happen.  The governor and the legislature said they would fix public education by increasing teacher pay to the regional average.  That action resulted in no significant improvement in test scores. 

     A major issue is over 50% of Oklahoma public education dollars are being spent for non-classroom related activities.  That number hasn't changed in over 25 years.  Republicans, who took control of the state legislature in 2004, have dealt with public education largely the same way the Democrats did before for a century before. 

     Sharing of school administration and infrastructure is discussed, but never implemented.  Consolidation of school districts in rural areas is fought like the dickens.  Oklahoma taxpayers fund more school buildings and buses than any state per capita.  Recognizing the money isn't getting to the classroom and the unwillingness of parents to take responsibility for the education of their child is dismissed by public education leadership. 

     The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.  That is what Oklahoma continues to do in public education.

     Second, Walters is a self-promoter.  That's why he made the announcement on Fox News instead of local media.  He loves attention.  Instead of making fundamental changes to public education as he campaigned, Walters has spent his three years in office sensationalizing and engaging in melodrama.  He appears angry and confrontational, even to those who agreed with him.  He has alienated former allies and takes pride in making political enemies.  Oklahoma public education hasn't improved during his tenure.  It remains static. 

     During his three years in office, Walters has amassed a loyal following who believe he is faultless, unstained, and incorruptible.  While Ryan Walters' political future is uncertain, he has cultivated a formidable voter base.  Don't be surprised if Walters runs for Oklahoma governor.    

     Third, the next State Superintendent must take on the education establishment.  Governor Stitt will appoint someone to serve out the remainder of Walter's term.  The next Supper needs to focus on how tax dollars are being spent in public education.  They should demand financial accountability.  They should recognize they can't dictate improvement in a public education with a memo or a news conference.  It is going to take a plan to help Oklahoma parents take equity in their kid's education. The next education czar needs to have the courage to admit they don't know everything- a rare trait for a politician.

     The reaction to Walters' departure varied.  His political opponents held parties celebrating his resignation, while his allies blamed his detractors for pushing him out.  No one doubts Ryan Walters has courage, but it more than courage to get thing done.  It takes action, purpose, direction, commitment, and resilience to move policy forward.  His inability to 'sell' his ideas before he held a news conference made him ineffective.  Walters wasn't always wrong, nor was he always right, but Ryan was always in front of a camera.

Political Parties should determine their nominee!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

DON’T SIGN SQ836

by Steve Fair

      On Tuesday the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the Oklahoma Republican Party (OKGOP) that State Question 836 (SQ 836) can proceed to the signature-gathering phase. The OKGOP had argued SQ 836 infringed on the First Amendment rights of political parties and violated a parties' 'associational rights. 

  SQ836 proposes an open primary where all candidates would appear on a single primary ballot, regardless of party affiliation.  All registered voters, including Independents, could vote and the top two candidates would advance to the general election.    Currently Oklahoma has modified closed primaries.  Only voters registered Republican can vote in the Republican primary.  Democrats allow Independents to vote in their primary.  Changes to the primary system require a change to the state constitution and therefore a vote of the people.  Supporters of SQ836 now have 90 days to collect at least 172,993 valid signatures from Oklahoma voters.  If they are successful, SQ836 would likely be on the November 2026 ballot.  SQ836 could still face legal challenges.  In its ruling, the Supreme Court said the challenge to the initiative petition could occur after signatures have been collected. 

     In a separate case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court granted temporary relief from a new law (Senate Bill 1027), which was passed last session to restrict geographical areas where initiative petition signatures could be gathered. The ruling means supporters of SQ 836 will not have to comply with the new rules during their signature drive.  Three observations:

     First, political parties should determine their nominee, not outsiders.  It makes no sense for those who do not identify, agree with, or participate in an organization to have a say in the parties' business.  No civic club or church opens their business meetings up to whoever walks in off the street.  That's crazy, but that is what Democrats and some Republicans want.  Why?  Because they are losing elections!  If open primaries are such a great idea, why didn't the Ds want it when they dominated Oklahoma politics for a century?  Because open primaries are not a good idea.  It's a scheme to win elections with candidates who are not as conservative.  It's a plan to move Oklahoma to the left.  Instead of educating voters, which takes time and effort, proponents of SQ836 want an election system that will promote manipulation, conniving and scheming. 

     Second, not just Republicans should oppose SQ836.  Democrats should not support a system that allows Rs to vote to determine their nominee.  SQ836 would hurt the Democrat brand.  If registered Independents truly are 'independent,' they shouldn't support it.  They should want the three recognized parties in Oklahoma to pick their nominee and the Independents can vote in the general.  Open primaries would render political parties irrelevant and meaningless.    

     Third, informed citizens should not sign the petition.  Signature solicitors will be at the state fair, in parking lots, and online.  They will make the false claim Oklahoma's current primary system is unfair and disenfranchises/excludes voters. But no voter is excluded in a closed primary who doesn't choose to be excluded.  To participate in the GOP primary, a voter need only to register Republican.  Simple as that.  Don't sign the petition! 

     If Oklahoma moves to open primaries, political parties will become toothless and meaningless.  Special interest money will pour into politics, making it next to impossible for grassroots candidates to win.  Oklahoma's title of the most conservative state in America will be gone.  But those who want Oklahoma to be more liberal will be back in control.   

AMERICA HAS A HEART PROBLEM!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

HANDLING THE TRUTH

by Steve Fair

 

     The killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, 31, has dominated the news since he was shot at a Utah college campus on Wednesday.  The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is being held without bail after being turned in by his father.  Robinson is not cooperating with authorities.  On Friday night, Kirk's widow issued a statement standing by Kirk's chair where he sat when he broadcast his popular podcast.  She vowed to continue Kirk's work at Turning Point USA, and continue his Fall campus tour.  "It will be greater than ever," Erika Kirk said.  Three observations:

       First, political violence is never acceptable.  No civilized society settles political or religious disagreements by killing those who espouse a differing viewpoint.  But that is where we are in the United States- uncivilized/uncouth/course.  Heated political rhetoric on both sides of the political spectrum make 'agreeing to disagree,' nearly impossible.  Most rational people condemned Kirk's murder, but some liberals who disagreed with his political views were ecstatic he had been cut down and rejoiced in his death.  Such behavior reveals a dark, depraved heart in need of regeneration.  America has a 'heart' problem.  Believers should be pleading for a sovereign God to touch hearts and draw men to Him, otherwise our country is doomed.    

     Second, acknowledging different viewpoints was one of Kirk's characteristics.  He would often publicly debate college students whose liberal views contradicted his own, listening with respect.  Kirk reached college students by encouraging them to use critical thinking skills to challenge what they believed.  He taught them political apologetics and forced them to defend their particular position by reasoning and systematic presentation of ideas.  Instead of learning to regurgitate material for a grade, Kirk challenged students to think.  Colleges are teaching students, "what to think," and not "how to think."  They have become institutions of indoctrination, not institutions of higher learning. 

     Third, truth can be offensive.  People don't want to hear the truth and it often makes them mad.  Because they lack critical thinking, reflective judgment and logical inquiry skills, they are easily offended by those who believe differently than they do.  The real truth is not a subjective human concept but an absolute standard stemming from God's infallible character, words, and deeds. Believers believe Jesus is the ultimate revelation of God and, therefore, the source of absolute truth itself.  When He said, "I am the truth," he was not just referring to his teachings but to his very person and divine nature.  Jesus embodied the truth entirely and He was killed for it. 

     Three closing points: (1) Charlie Kirk was not perfect.  No one is.  Some have deified him and have placed him as an object of worship.  Only God is to be worshipped.  Kirk may be admired for his dedication to a cause, but God should be preeminent to believers.  (2) Free Speech is under constant attack in America.  The thought police are out in full force.  When free speech is gone, America is gone.  (3) The events of the last week should make everyone more introspective, not more boisterous.  The depravity of the situation should drive true believers to their knees.    

     In his book, Truth Wars, John MacArthur exhorted people to, "Buy the truth, and do not sell it."  His point is the truth should be cherished and defended.  It shouldn't be compromised for relevance.  "An understanding and appreciation of biblical truth is a hallmark of a genuine believer, " MacArthur writes. 

     Col. Nathan Jessup famously yelled at Lt. Daniel Kaffee: "you can't handle the truth."   

Sadly, that seems to be where many Americans are. 

Homeless problem is more complex than having OHP haul off trash!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

KICK THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD

by Steve Fair

 

     In 2024, SB#1854, authored by Senators Weaver, (R-Moore), Shane Jett, (R-Shawnee), Cody Rogers, (R-Catoosa), and Rep. Chris Kannady, (R-Moore), was signed into law.  It made it a crime to have a homeless encampment on state owned property.  On Thursday, Governor Kevin Stitt announced the creation of Operation SAFE (Swift Action for Families Everywhere).  SAFE's first act was to clear homeless camps in Tulsa set up on state owned property inside Tulsa city limits.  On Friday, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP) removed 5 truckloads of debris from 21 homeless camps across Tulsa.  The camps were closed down, apparently without notice.  Illegal immigrants were arrested and turned over to ICE.   Tulsa County Sheriff Vic Regalado, whose jail facilities are near capacity, said:  "I think we're missing the point in all of this. We can't incarcerate ourselves out of homelessness."

     When he announced the action, Stitt said it wasn't his job to deal with Tulsa's homeless problem, but Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols and Tulsa leadership 'have not met the level of action needed to keep neighborhoods safe.'  Mayor Nichols fired back saying: “Kevin Stitt has shown himself again to be an unserious person. I am not interested in being lectured by someone who has proven time and time again that he only cares to intervene to score political points.” Nichols is a former four-term Democrat state representative who is a regular critic of Stitt. Three observations:

     First, homelessness is a national issue.  An estimated 770,000 people are homeless in America.  That is up nearly 20% in the last two years.  One in four homeless in the US are in California.  The rising cost of housing is a factor, but a high percentage of homeless are mentally ill or drug users.  Some people who experience homelessness are employed in low-wage jobs and can't afford a place to live, but some are homeless for reasons known only to them.       

     Second, it's not a crime to be homeless.  The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oklahoma rightly pointed that out after the governor's decree.  The ACLU solution is for the overtaxed/overworked to give the homeless a hand out and turn them into permanent dependents for the taxpayer.  Many homeless don't identify as victims.  They simply dropped out of society because they wanted out of the rat race.  They want to be left alone.  When their independence intrudes on other citizen's liberty, then something has to be done.  Homeless camps in Tulsa had become areas for drug use, crime and unsanitary conditions.  While it's not a crime to live without a home, it is a crime to not respect a fellow citizen's property.    

     Third, there is not a 'right to roam,' in the U.S.  In many countries of the world, public land can be used by the public for reactional purposes.  In early America, allowing public access to government land was a given and the concept was considered for inclusion in the U.S. Constitution.  While public lands are generally accessible, most have restrictions and charge fees.  

     In a June 2024 case (City of Grants Pass vs. Johnson), the U.S. Supreme Court held local governments can criminalize public camping and sleeping for people experiencing homelessness.  The Court reasoned camping bans address behavior, not homelessness as a status.  

     Government is good at implementing short-term fixes and avoiding the core problem.  The homeless problem in Oklahoma is more complex than hauling off trash and running people off public land.  Stitt's action did little more than 'kick the can down the road.' Stitt, Nichols and other local leaders in the Sooner state should work with non-government organizations to determine the root cause of homelessness.  Treating symptoms and not the root cause will just relocate the problem, not fix it.

AUDIT REVEALS INCOMPETENCE IN OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENT!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

INCOMPETENCE

by Steve Fair

 

     On Wednesday, Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector (OSAI) Cindy Byrd released a 200-page performance audit on federal money the state of Oklahoma received in COVID relief funds.  Byrd said that state agencies failed to spend the money as it was designated.  The audit found the money was spent on administrative salaries and personal expenses and not on public assistance as the feds had intended.  Byrd says state taxpayers may possibly be on the hook for up to $200 million.

     Oklahoma received almost $5 billion in federal COVID-19 relief from two major pieces of federal legislation, the CARES Act and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). The money was earmarked for the state, local governments, and tribal nations, to fund  a variety of programs and services- Byrd claims the Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) mishandled $22 million dollars designated to help Oklahomans with rental assistance.  The Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to adhere to the guidelines associated with another $63 million of the relief money according to the audit.  Byrd said Oklahoma taxpayers may have to pay back almost $200 million dollars.  Three observations:

     First, Oklahoma taxpayers deserve better.  It is not surprising government bureaucrats blow through taxpayer money.  That is what bureaucrats do, but when they ignore spending guidelines and are not competent to do the job, they should be fired.  At the very least, a bureaucrat should have the necessary ability, knowledge and skill to do the job they are being paid to do.  When they fail, those who are elected and charged with appointing and managing those bureaucrats must be held accountable.  Governor Stitt appointed the directors of the two aforementioned agencies.  He is a lame duck and is term-limited, so voters can just butt a stump.  It appears there will be no repercussion or consequences for the incompetence.    

     Second, OMES is a bloated unnecessary state agency and DHS has always been a money pit.  OMES was created in 2012 when Mary Fallin was governor.  The stated reason, at that time, was to consolidate government services and improve efficiency.  The real reason was to give the weak governorship in the Sooner state more power. Since inception, OMES has been a boondoggle that has resulted in an extra layer of government.  DHS has traditionally had a huge annual budget, fraught with waste, so it's no surprise they couldn't properly administer the relief money.  OMES should be dismantled and DHS retooled.            

     Third, the power of the OSAI needs to be expanded.  The state constitution mandates the OSAI audit county government and state agencies, but performing performance audits must be requested by the governor or the leadership of the legislature.  Most Oklahomans mistakenly believe the state auditor can audit anything/anybody/anytime.  To expand the scope of the OSAI's duties would require a vote of the people, but it's past time to get it done.  A conservative legislator should run a Joint Resolution in the coming session expanding OSAI's duties. 

     Cindy Byrd is an announced candidate for Lt. Governor.  Critics of the audit's findings claim she timed the audit's release to further her 2026 statewide campaign.  Byrd has been further accused of 'spinning' the audit's findings, but there is no evidence that is the case. 

     The job of the auditor is to find fraud and corruption and expose it.  Only the naïve and simple believe Oklahoma state government bureaucrats did the right thing with the COVID relief money.  Clearly, errors were made and those who point errors out shouldn't be attacked- they should be commended.  It remains to be seen if the feds will require taxpayers to pay back the misspent money, but meanwhile at OMES and DHS, it's business as usual.

NO TEST WILL FIX AMERICA'S PROBLEM!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

TEST PANDERING

by Steve Fair

 

     Oklahoma is a politically conservative state.  Voters in the Sooner state have voted for the Republican candidate for president since 1968- 15 straight elections!  Republicans have super majorities in both Oklahoma state legislative chambers.  The entire federal delegation is Republican.  All statewide elected officials are Republican.  Republicans dominate elected county offices.  To describe Oklahoma a 'Red state,' is an understatement.  But that could be changing. 

     Oklahoma is experiencing significant inbound domestic migration, attracting over 25,000 new residents each year.  Many are coming from California and other 'blue' states, bringing their politics with them.  A conservative in a 'blue' state is very often a liberal in Oklahoma.  These new Okies scare conservatives in the Sooner state.   One elected official has announced a way to screen these new immigrants.  Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters has announced a plan to test teachers coming to Oklahoma from a liberal state.  Using an assessment developed by the conservative media company, PragerU, out-of-state teacher will have to pass a fifty-question test that appears to be along the line of a basic civic quiz.  The move has sparked controversy, with opponents of Walters labeling the test a "MAGA loyalty test."

     “As long as I am superintendent, Oklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New York. Any teacher coming from these states will be required to pass our new PragerU assessment before receiving certification, because we refuse to let Gavin Newsom's (governor of California) woke, Marxist agenda turn Oklahoma into the same dumpster fire California has become,” Walters says.  Three observations:

     First, what is PragerU?  Started by Dennis Prager, a Jewish talk show host, and screenwriter Allen Estrin (Touched by an Angel, The Practice) in 2009 to promote conservative and capitalist viewpoints using videos, PragerU doesn't confer degrees.  It is privately funded, with the initial seed money coming from conservative Texas oil tycoon Dan Wilks.       

    Prager, 77, has been called the Jewish Billy Graham, speaks four languages, and has hosted a nationally syndicated conservative talk show for over 25 years.  Prager is a secularist in theology, but has supporters at both ends of the conservative political spectrum. 

     Second, no test will weed out the woke.  All teachers should know basic civics, and not just teachers from blue states.  Every Oklahoman (teacher or otherwise) should know the number of members in the U.S. House of Representatives (435).  They should know the first three words of the U.S. Constitution. (We the People).  But administering a test to separate the sheep from the goats won't work.  Nothing prevents a 'liberal' teacher from marking the 'conservative' answer?  Nothing! 

     For years, conservative college students played 'toady' game.  They passed tests by 'telling the prof what the teacher wanted to hear.'  They hid their true values in order to pass a course.  They pandered/sucked up for a grade.  The 'woke' will do the same on the PragerU test.

     Third, local control of education is a mark of conservativism.  Republicans have advocated for the federal Department of Education to be disbanded for decades.  Every GOP- national and state- platform touts the importance of education decisions being the responsibility of parents and local school boards.  Local school boards are elected by the patrons of the local school district and have the power and authority to hire and fire administrators and teachers.  Because they are on the front lines, local school leadership is in a better position to protect Oklahoma students from the radical left agenda. Parents, administrators, and school board members should pay close attention to what is being taught in the classroom.  If a 'woke' teacher is promoting a world view inconsistent with local values, they should be held accountable.  If local leadership is unwilling to deal with it, vote them out.   

     The woke are educating our children because the American family is disintegrating. When coupled with unengaged citizens in local education, the radical left has a perfect storm.  No test can fix that.      

D.C. is not what Washington envisioned!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

RETROCESSION

by Steve Fair

 

     Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.). was established in 1789 as a federal district under exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress.  D.C. sets on the Potomac River, across from Virginia.  It shares a land border with Maryland.  In 1846, Congress reduced the size of D.C. by returning land originally ceded by Virginia, including the city of Alexandria.  That action is known as retrocession. 

    D.C. is divided into quadrants that are centered on the Capitol Building.  As of 2020, the population of D.C. is 690,000.  Citizens elect a mayor and 13 council members, who have governed the city since 1973.  D.C. citizens have no voting representative in Congress, but since 1961 have cast three (3) electoral votes in the presidential race. 

     The purpose of the District of Columbia is to serve as the seat of the U.S. federal government. It was established as a neutral territory, separate from any state, to house the nation's capital and its governing bodies. This ensures the federal government's independence from state politics and allows Congress to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the District. There have been several unsuccessful efforts to make D.C. the 51st state.  The latest was in 2021, when a statehood bill passed the House, but died in the Senate. 

    Last week, citing the crime rate, President Trump announced he was activating 800 National Guard members to take over D.C.'s police department.  Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, who denies crime is out of control in her city, described the troop deployment as an "authoritarian push."  Three observations:

     First, Trump has the authority to be authoritarian.  Until 1973, Congress and the president had 'total control' over the district.  The Home Rule Act of 1973 gave D.C. residents more control over their local government, but with limitations.  Congress and the president still oversee D'C's budget and can intervene/override the district's local government.  A bill to repeal the Home Rule Act was introduced in February, but failed to gain enough support to become law.  D.C.'s local government is primarily federal funded by American taxpayer dollars, not local taxes.   

     Second, crime is a problem in D.C.  In 2024, Washington, D.C. had a homicide rate of 27.3 per 100,000 residents.  That is the fourth highest homicide rate in the country- six times higher than NYC.  If D.C. were a state, it would have the highest homicide rate of any state in the U.S.  D.C.'s homicide rate has doubled in the last 13 years.  Local police have proven they are not up to the task of dealing with their crime rate.  Trump was right to send in the National Guard. 

     Third, D.C. should be reduced in size.  The idea of returning land from Washington, D.C. to Maryland and Virginia, known as retrocession, has been discussed for years. The Constitution allows Congress to alter the federal district's boundaries.  As mentioned above, a portion of the original District was retroceded to Virginia in 1846. 

     Both bordering states have shown little interest in annexing the District, probably because assuming responsibility for a high crime/high unemployment city is not in their best interest.  But it is past time for D.C. citizens to assume responsibility for their own city. Instead of making D.C. a state, the residential areas of the district should be folded into the adjoining states.  One potential obstacle is that retrocession might require a constitutional amendment. 

     When Congress passed the Residence Act in 1790 calling for the permanent seat of government to be located on the Potomac, President Washington took personal control of the layout and construction.  D.C. was originally a ten-mile square block of land that would house the president's mansion, the Capitol and other federal buildings.  It was never intended to be home to 690,000 with the highest crime rate in America.

A REDISTRICTING WAR LOOMS IN AMERICA!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

BREAKING QUORUM

by Steve Fair

 

     Texas House Democrats fled the Lone Star state in an attempt to prevent GOP state lawmakers from redrawing federal congressional districts in the state.  The Republican led re-districting proposal could add up to five GOP seats in the U.S. House.   The redistricting is being closely watched nationally. 

   Texas legislative rules require two thirds of members (100 of 150) be present for a quorum and a vote to be taken.   There are 88 Republicans and 62 Democrats in the Texas state House.  Rs only need 12 Ds to be present to conduct business. 

     Most of the Texas Democrat House lawmakers flew to Illinois to hide in an effort to block the passage of the redistricting map.  The tactic called 'breaking quorum' could violate their oath of office and result in removement from office.  Three observations:

     First, elections have consequences.  Democrats are complaining because Republicans in the Texas legislature are in charge of redistricting, but for years the Ds were the majority Party and in control.  When they were the majority, they drew districts favorable to the Ds.  Republicans now have a majority and can redraw the districts.  Democrats can't really prevent it unless the entire delegation stays out of the state until at least November.  That is not likely.  The Texas legislature needs to approve the new districts before the filing of the 2026 midterm elections (November 2025). 

     Second, Texas Ds have pulled this stunt before.  Breaking quorum is a tired and true tactic of Texas Democratic lawmakers.  Back in 2003, more than 50 Democrat legislators holed up in an Ardmore, OK Holiday Inn for a month to protest a redistricting plan.  One D lawmaker finally broke rank and went home.  He was compelled to show up in the chamber, a quorum was established and the bill was placed.  The Ds did it again in 2021 to protest voting procedure changes in Texas, but once again someone got homesick and the deadlock was broken. 

     "If you're the minority party, and you can't block any legislation, one nuclear option you always have is to walk out, thereby preventing the legislature from engaging in any activity and particularly passing legislation," Mark P. Jones, a political science professor at Rice University explains.  But Jones says the action just delays the inevitable.  It seldom derails it. 

     Third, state redistricting impacts all Americans.  The 435 members of the U.S. House are allocated according to population.  Each state legislature draws the congressional districts within the state.  With Republicans holding the majority in 28 of the 50 state legislatures, you would think congressional districts would favor the GOP.  But they don't control several of the larger population states (NY, CA, IL).  That's why the margin in the House is so slim.  Republicans currently hold a narrow seven-member majority vs. Democrats in the House.  If GOP state legislatures draw districts more favorable to GOP candidates, in theory more Rs will be elected to the House. 

     What isn't being talked about is Democrat controlled state legislatures are working to gerrymander districts to aid the liberal cause.  The outrage by Ds in the Texas legislature on what Rs are doing in redistricting is hypocritical and sanctimonious.

     Texas Governor Greg Abbott says if the Democratic lawmakers return, "they will be arrested and taken to the Capitol."  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claims to have started procedures to remove thirteen of the Democratic legislative deserters from office.  Paxton claims they violated their oath of office and vacated the office by not showing up for a quorum call.

    One thing is sure- Democrats will not be successful in stopping the Texas redistricting.  The fleeing the state strategy hasn't worked in the past and will fail this time.  Breaking quorum is a lot like breaking wind- noisy and it stinks. 

WALTERS' TVGATE DOESN'T PASS SMELL TEST!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

SETUP OR SHENANIGANS?

by Steve Fair

Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters is being investigated after two Oklahoma state school board members claimed to see images of naked women on his office’s TV screen during a closed-door executive session.   

The two board members — Becky Carson and Ryan Deatherage — are recent appointees to the board. Deatherage, appointed in February, is the director of 911 and emergency management for Kingfisher County and serves as Associate Director of Oklahoma Baptist Disaster Relief. Carson, appointed in April, is a retired special education teacher from Edmond. Both replaced board members who were more supportive of Superintendent Walters than they have been. Three observations:

First, the images were likely there. The two people who say they saw them appear to be credible and trustworthy. Walters says he did not see them but immediately turned the set off when they pointed out nudity was on the screen. Some of Walters’ supporters are accusing Carson and Deatherage of lying about what they saw, but whatever they saw was disturbing to them.

The real question is: if porn was on the TV screen, how did it get there? Also, are Oklahoma taxpayers paying for erotic channels? Was the state school board TV hacked? And if so, who did it and how? Those are the questions Oklahoma taxpayers deserve to know the answers to.

Walters’ supporters point out Carson and Deatherage are critical of Walters. It is true the duo has challenged Walters during state school board meetings but so have other board members. It’s premature to claim Carson and Deatherage were in on a setup, but if one exists, they should pay the price.

Walters’ political enemies claim he may be using this bizarre incident to deflect attention from the recent educational outcome rankings. The Sooner State is dead last in the country. Not likely the superintendent would use this type of ‘Wag the Dog’ distraction tactic if that were true.

Second, an in-depth investigation should be conducted. How porn got on a taxpayer-owned TV during a state school board meeting needs explanation. If Walters is watching smut on the taxpayers’ dime, he should face the music, which would include resigning from office. Conversely, if Walters is innocent and is being set up, whoever is framing him should be exposed and punished.

Immediately after the incident, Oklahoma House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, urged Walters to “unlock and turn over all relevant devises.” The question is, turn over to whom? Last Sunday Senate Pro Temp Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, and Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, released a joint statement saying Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services will investigate the incident.

OMES is the bloated oversight state agency created by Republicans in 2011. The governor appoints an OMES director with the approval of the Oklahoma State Senate.

After singing off the same sheet of music for two years, Gov. Stitt and Supt. Walters have been ‘on the outs’ in recent months. No one at OMES is elected by the people; they are appointed. Can OMES oversee a fair, unbiased, impartial investigation since they report to the governor? Not likely. 

Third, Walters is his own worst enemy. His policies are controversial, but it is his self-promoting, polarizing personality is the real issue. Walters is constantly in the news. He is drawn to a TV camera like a moth to a flame. He openly expresses his opinion and is steadfast, unmovable, and stubborn — rare characteristics for an elected official. But Walters is not always right and everyone else wrong. The flipside is he is not always wrong and the education establishment right. No matter your views on his policies, Walters was elected by the people of Oklahoma. He should be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Walters would be stupid to play a sexploitation film on a conference room TV during a state school board meeting. That would take some gall. His critics believe he is that dense and insolent. His allies say this is an elaborate attempt to falsely incriminate.

Apparently, OMES handed the investigation off to Oklahoma County Sheriff Tommy Johnson. An elected partisan shouldn’t be doing the investigation. An independent counsel should be appointed by the Legislature. Walters should willingly cooperate with an independent investigation. No one should want to know the truth more than Ryan Walters. Any peep of predetermined outcome should be squelched. If Walters is pulling shenanigans, he should resign. If he is being set up, those responsible should be prosecuted.

SQ#836 would move Oklahoma to the left!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

SQ#836 IS FLIM-FLAM!

by Steve Fair

 

     On June 24^th, the Oklahoma Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by the Oklahoma Republican Party challenging the constitutionality of SQ# 836.  Justices did not immediately issue a ruling.  SQ#836 aims to change Oklahoma’s primary election system from closed primaries to an open system.  The OKGOP maintains SQ#836 violates the First Amendment rights of association by forcing the Party to accept votes from those not registered with the Party.  They contend political parties have the right to determine who participates in their nomination process.

     Proponents of SQ#836 were represented by former U.S. Attorney Robert McCampbell.  He pointed out the US Supreme Court has ruled that a top-two primary system does not violate political party associational rights.  Three observations:

     First, changing the primary election will move Oklahoma to the left.  The motivation behind SQ#836 is because Democrats are losing at the ballot box.  D’s tried, with limited success, to get their candidates to run as Republicans.  That made it difficult for primary voters to identify the sheep from the goats.  The Democrat’s next strategy is to eliminate branding.  They want to make Party affiliation insignificant.  They want to blur and obscure a candidate’s values/positions so they can get more progressives elected.    SQ#836 is the springboard to a more liberal state government.  No true conservative is supporting it. 

     Second, changing the primary election will promote hijinks.  SQ#836 would increase the practice of candidates deceitfully positioning themselves as a conservative to win an election.  SQ#836 is a Trojan house.  Proponents are selling the fairness/harmless/beneficial of it, but fail to disclose the hidden danger and malicious intent it actually promotes.  SQ#836 would encourage candidates to practice deceit and chicanery.  It is already next to impossible to discern the genuine from the bogus in the current system.  Flipping to a primary where those not registered in a Party can determine the Party’s nominee is asinine.

     Third, changing the primary election will empower special interests. Proponents of SQ#836 trumpet how it will bring fairness, equity, and honesty to the primary system.  But what is fair about a system where those who don’t want to be a part of an organization want to tell that organization how to operate?  SQ#836 would draw special interest money like flies to sugar.  Mass marketing of empty suit light weights would put the power in the hands of big donors.  Trade associations and industries are already buying legislative seats in Oklahoma.  SQ#836 would take it to the next level.

     SQ#836 isn’t about fairness.  It’s about control.  It’s about winning elections.  Every registered voter in Oklahoma can already participate in primary elections.  They just have to register with the Party that aligns with their values.  That is just common sense.  Outsiders shouldn’t pick a Party’s nominee.  SQ#836 is a scam promoted by flim-flam artists.   Unfortunately, some of those bilkers have an ‘R’ by their name.  If the Oklahoma Supreme Court rules against the OKGOP, then SQ#836 advocates will start gathering signatures to get it on the ballot.  They have to gather 173,000 statewide in a short window.  Oklahomans should decline, reject, repudiate and spurn requests to put their John Hancock on the petition, not matter how persuasive the solicitor.  SQ#836 is not OK.   

 

SKELETONS RARELY STAY IN THE CLOSET!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

SKELETONS

by Steve Fair

     In Numbers 32:23, Moses warns the tribes of Reuben and Gad their unfaithfulness will be exposed.  The scripture presents the principle that misbehavior and wrongdoing, deliberate or not, will eventually be discovered and have consequences.  Secrets are rarely kept forever, and actions always have repercussions. 

     This week at a Coldplay concert in Massachusetts, a “kiss cam” was displayed on a big screen.  A blond woman and a silver-haired man ducked and ran off when they saw their images on the big screen.  Turns out the pair were married, but not to each other.  The man resigned his CEO position at an Artificial Intelligence (AI) data company he co-founded as a result of the incident.  Video of the “kiss cam” has gone viral.  Three observations:

     First, secrets rarely remain secrets.  It’s human nature to share with others, even the most private things.  Keeping secrets is psychologically draining and sometimes people just have to tell someone their innermost thoughts.  People tell others secrets to strengthen their bond with others.  They may be seeking support or help by bearing their soul.  Mistakes and leaks often reveal secrets through careless conversation and indiscreet actions.  In the modern world, data breaches expose emails, texts, social media posts the user thought were confidential.  Cameras are everywhere.  You can’t even run a stop light without getting caught!  “You can run, but you can’t hide,” has never been truer.

     Second, God sees all.  Yahweh sees all and knows all.  He is omniscient (all knowing).  He is omnipresent (everywhere all the time).  God is aware of everything that has happened, is happening and will happen.  Proverbs 15:3 states: "The eyes of the LORD are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good." This verse highlights God's constant awareness and observation of both righteous and wicked behavior.  Even if a person successfully fools every person on earth, they just can’t sneak it past God.   Hebrews 4:13 says: "And no creature is hidden from his sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give account." 

     Third, we reap what we sow.  Generally, in life, one receives the consequences of their actions- both positive and negative. Whether one believes in God or not, the law of cause and effect is universally recognized, so we should be conscious of the actions we take, as they will determine our harvest. 

     In the political arena, secrets are known as “skeletons in the closet.”  They are hidden things that happened in someone’s past that might affect their political campaign or career.  Exposure of skeletons are used to undermine an opponent’s reputation and influence constituents. 

     The Jeffery Epstein client list has dominated the recent news cycle.  Accusations of a cover up and speculation on who is on the list- if it exists- rage.  Passionate opinions condemn the inconsistency of past statements about the list.  

      Even if skeletons don’t fall out of Epstein’s closet, the participants in his sordid enterprise will be exposed- in this world or the next. The disclosure might not as public as a big screen “kiss cam,” but be not deceived, God is not mocked.  They will pay the price for their perversion.