Sunday, January 5, 2025

ELIMINATING WASTE IS HARDER THAN IDENTIFYING!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial


WASTE!

by Steve Fair

 

     Wasteful government spending has been an issue since America’s founding.  As the country has grown, so has the budgets at federal, state and local levels.  Most states have ‘balanced budget’ provisions, which requires that government not spend more than they take in.  That is not the case at the federal level.  In 2023, the federal government budget was $6.1 trillion ($47,000 per household).  The deficit was an astonishing $1.7 trillion.  With consumers paying more for less, taxpayers are struggling while government is not impacted. 

             The late Senator Tom Coburn famously published his annual ‘Wastebook,’ which highlighted wasteful spending, unusual research projects funded by grants, and tax breaks given to corporations.  Senators James Lankford and Rand Paul have continued the tradition and in 2024 they identified $10.5 trillion in wasteful spending.

     President Trump has created the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.  It’s objective is to cut the federal government down to size.  They will identify areas of waste and encourage Congress to cut funding.

     Oklahoma Speaker of the House designate Kyle Hilbert, (R-Bristow) coat tariled DOGE by announcing the creation of a web portal where Sooner taxpayers can report government waste, fraud, abuse and inefficiency.    Limited to 3,500 words, a taxpayer can vent about nine state agencies and their inaptitude.  To rail, go to https://former.okhouse.gov/doge/ Three observations:

     First, government- at all levels- is wasteful.  Unlike a business or a consumer, it’s rare to find an elected official or bureaucrat taking equity in spending.  Because they are spending the taxpayer’s money and not their own, they most often take the path of least resistance.  When compensation or job performance evaluation isn’t dependent on how tax dollars are managed, why take ownership?  Until taxpayers start holding those responsible with government oversight accountable, little will change.

     Second, identifying waste is easy than eliminating it.  The creation of a private group to examine and scrutinize federal government efficiency and spending has been done twice before, both with limited results. 

     In 1905, President Teddy Roosevelt created the Committee on Department Methods (CDM) to explore ways to improve government efficiency.  Headed by Charles Keep, an assistant secretary of the Treasury, the commission exposed massive bureaucracy and inefficiency in government procurement.  Unlike DOGE, CDM’s primary work was administrative process improvement.  Few of the Keep Commission’s recommendations were implemented.

     In 1982, President Reagan appointed industrialist Peter Grace to head up the Grace Commission, a group of 160 CEOs(all volunteers) to identify government waste.  The Commission was also charged with finding opportunities for increased efficiency and improving managerial and administrative controls.  After 18 months, the Grace Commission’s report pointed out $424 billion of bloat.  Some of their most egregious and shocking findings were: the Department of Defense (DOD) was spending $436 for a claw hammer and $511 for a single 60-watt lightbulb.   Only about one fourth of the Grace Commission’s recommendations were heeded by Congress.  Will DOGE do better?  Remains to be seen.

     Third, Oklahoma has a state auditor.  Unlike the federal government, Oklahoma has a constitutionally created office, elected by voters.  The state auditor should be unleased (authorized and funded) to do comprehensive performance audits on every agency that receives a dime of state tax dollars.  If Oklahoma state legislators are really serious about finding waste, that’s the way to find it.  Asking constituents to report their bad experiences at an state agency in a portal scores points at the ballot box, but it is not a precise method to identify government waste.   

     Wasteful spending is subjective.  What one person considers essential and needful, another finds extravagant and unnecessary. But when it comes to government, virtually all Americans recognize tax dollars are being frittered away.  Finding it is one thing- eliminating it another!