OKLAHOMA PUBLIC EDUCATION NEEDS MORE THAN MONEY!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

WALTERS RESIGNATION

by Steve Fair

 

     The Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) was founded in 1991 by Washington state legislator Robert Williams and political operative/consultant Lynn Harsh.  It is a 501c3 organization promoting conservative causes.  In March, the Freedom Foundation started the Teacher Freedom Alliance (TFA).  The TFA is an anti-union organization for teachers that does not engage in collective bargaining with school districts.  It exists to help removing existing teachers’ unions and providing liability insurance for classroom teachers.  Oklahoma already has a similar organization- Public Educators of Oklahoma (POE).  One of the founders of POE- Mike Tinney- is on the state school board.

     On Wednesday on Fox News, Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instructor Ryan Walters announced he will be resigning in October to become the CEO of the Teacher Freedom Alliance.  Three observations:

     First, Oklahoma's public education outcomes remain stagnant.  For years, Oklahoma has lagged behind in education.  The Oklahoma Education Association (OEA) lobbies every year for legislators to increase teacher pay.  They promise if teachers are paid more, test outcomes will improve.  That has yet to happen.  When Ryan Walters was elected, he assured voters he would turn it around.  That didn't happen.  The governor and the legislature said they would fix public education by increasing teacher pay to the regional average.  That action resulted in no significant improvement in test scores. 

     A major issue is over 50% of Oklahoma public education dollars are being spent for non-classroom related activities.  That number hasn't changed in over 25 years.  Republicans, who took control of the state legislature in 2004, have dealt with public education largely the same way the Democrats did before for a century before. 

     Sharing of school administration and infrastructure is discussed, but never implemented.  Consolidation of school districts in rural areas is fought like the dickens.  Oklahoma taxpayers fund more school buildings and buses than any state per capita.  Recognizing the money isn't getting to the classroom and the unwillingness of parents to take responsibility for the education of their child is dismissed by public education leadership. 

     The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.  That is what Oklahoma continues to do in public education.

     Second, Walters is a self-promoter.  That's why he made the announcement on Fox News instead of local media.  He loves attention.  Instead of making fundamental changes to public education as he campaigned, Walters has spent his three years in office sensationalizing and engaging in melodrama.  He appears angry and confrontational, even to those who agreed with him.  He has alienated former allies and takes pride in making political enemies.  Oklahoma public education hasn't improved during his tenure.  It remains static. 

     During his three years in office, Walters has amassed a loyal following who believe he is faultless, unstained, and incorruptible.  While Ryan Walters' political future is uncertain, he has cultivated a formidable voter base.  Don't be surprised if Walters runs for Oklahoma governor.    

     Third, the next State Superintendent must take on the education establishment.  Governor Stitt will appoint someone to serve out the remainder of Walter's term.  The next Supper needs to focus on how tax dollars are being spent in public education.  They should demand financial accountability.  They should recognize they can't dictate improvement in a public education with a memo or a news conference.  It is going to take a plan to help Oklahoma parents take equity in their kid's education. The next education czar needs to have the courage to admit they don't know everything- a rare trait for a politician.

     The reaction to Walters' departure varied.  His political opponents held parties celebrating his resignation, while his allies blamed his detractors for pushing him out.  No one doubts Ryan Walters has courage, but it more than courage to get thing done.  It takes action, purpose, direction, commitment, and resilience to move policy forward.  His inability to 'sell' his ideas before he held a news conference made him ineffective.  Walters wasn't always wrong, nor was he always right, but Ryan was always in front of a camera.

Political Parties should determine their nominee!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

DON’T SIGN SQ836

by Steve Fair

      On Tuesday the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the Oklahoma Republican Party (OKGOP) that State Question 836 (SQ 836) can proceed to the signature-gathering phase. The OKGOP had argued SQ 836 infringed on the First Amendment rights of political parties and violated a parties' 'associational rights. 

  SQ836 proposes an open primary where all candidates would appear on a single primary ballot, regardless of party affiliation.  All registered voters, including Independents, could vote and the top two candidates would advance to the general election.    Currently Oklahoma has modified closed primaries.  Only voters registered Republican can vote in the Republican primary.  Democrats allow Independents to vote in their primary.  Changes to the primary system require a change to the state constitution and therefore a vote of the people.  Supporters of SQ836 now have 90 days to collect at least 172,993 valid signatures from Oklahoma voters.  If they are successful, SQ836 would likely be on the November 2026 ballot.  SQ836 could still face legal challenges.  In its ruling, the Supreme Court said the challenge to the initiative petition could occur after signatures have been collected. 

     In a separate case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court granted temporary relief from a new law (Senate Bill 1027), which was passed last session to restrict geographical areas where initiative petition signatures could be gathered. The ruling means supporters of SQ 836 will not have to comply with the new rules during their signature drive.  Three observations:

     First, political parties should determine their nominee, not outsiders.  It makes no sense for those who do not identify, agree with, or participate in an organization to have a say in the parties' business.  No civic club or church opens their business meetings up to whoever walks in off the street.  That's crazy, but that is what Democrats and some Republicans want.  Why?  Because they are losing elections!  If open primaries are such a great idea, why didn't the Ds want it when they dominated Oklahoma politics for a century?  Because open primaries are not a good idea.  It's a scheme to win elections with candidates who are not as conservative.  It's a plan to move Oklahoma to the left.  Instead of educating voters, which takes time and effort, proponents of SQ836 want an election system that will promote manipulation, conniving and scheming. 

     Second, not just Republicans should oppose SQ836.  Democrats should not support a system that allows Rs to vote to determine their nominee.  SQ836 would hurt the Democrat brand.  If registered Independents truly are 'independent,' they shouldn't support it.  They should want the three recognized parties in Oklahoma to pick their nominee and the Independents can vote in the general.  Open primaries would render political parties irrelevant and meaningless.    

     Third, informed citizens should not sign the petition.  Signature solicitors will be at the state fair, in parking lots, and online.  They will make the false claim Oklahoma's current primary system is unfair and disenfranchises/excludes voters. But no voter is excluded in a closed primary who doesn't choose to be excluded.  To participate in the GOP primary, a voter need only to register Republican.  Simple as that.  Don't sign the petition! 

     If Oklahoma moves to open primaries, political parties will become toothless and meaningless.  Special interest money will pour into politics, making it next to impossible for grassroots candidates to win.  Oklahoma's title of the most conservative state in America will be gone.  But those who want Oklahoma to be more liberal will be back in control.   

AMERICA HAS A HEART PROBLEM!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

HANDLING THE TRUTH

by Steve Fair

 

     The killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, 31, has dominated the news since he was shot at a Utah college campus on Wednesday.  The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, is being held without bail after being turned in by his father.  Robinson is not cooperating with authorities.  On Friday night, Kirk's widow issued a statement standing by Kirk's chair where he sat when he broadcast his popular podcast.  She vowed to continue Kirk's work at Turning Point USA, and continue his Fall campus tour.  "It will be greater than ever," Erika Kirk said.  Three observations:

       First, political violence is never acceptable.  No civilized society settles political or religious disagreements by killing those who espouse a differing viewpoint.  But that is where we are in the United States- uncivilized/uncouth/course.  Heated political rhetoric on both sides of the political spectrum make 'agreeing to disagree,' nearly impossible.  Most rational people condemned Kirk's murder, but some liberals who disagreed with his political views were ecstatic he had been cut down and rejoiced in his death.  Such behavior reveals a dark, depraved heart in need of regeneration.  America has a 'heart' problem.  Believers should be pleading for a sovereign God to touch hearts and draw men to Him, otherwise our country is doomed.    

     Second, acknowledging different viewpoints was one of Kirk's characteristics.  He would often publicly debate college students whose liberal views contradicted his own, listening with respect.  Kirk reached college students by encouraging them to use critical thinking skills to challenge what they believed.  He taught them political apologetics and forced them to defend their particular position by reasoning and systematic presentation of ideas.  Instead of learning to regurgitate material for a grade, Kirk challenged students to think.  Colleges are teaching students, "what to think," and not "how to think."  They have become institutions of indoctrination, not institutions of higher learning. 

     Third, truth can be offensive.  People don't want to hear the truth and it often makes them mad.  Because they lack critical thinking, reflective judgment and logical inquiry skills, they are easily offended by those who believe differently than they do.  The real truth is not a subjective human concept but an absolute standard stemming from God's infallible character, words, and deeds. Believers believe Jesus is the ultimate revelation of God and, therefore, the source of absolute truth itself.  When He said, "I am the truth," he was not just referring to his teachings but to his very person and divine nature.  Jesus embodied the truth entirely and He was killed for it. 

     Three closing points: (1) Charlie Kirk was not perfect.  No one is.  Some have deified him and have placed him as an object of worship.  Only God is to be worshipped.  Kirk may be admired for his dedication to a cause, but God should be preeminent to believers.  (2) Free Speech is under constant attack in America.  The thought police are out in full force.  When free speech is gone, America is gone.  (3) The events of the last week should make everyone more introspective, not more boisterous.  The depravity of the situation should drive true believers to their knees.    

     In his book, Truth Wars, John MacArthur exhorted people to, "Buy the truth, and do not sell it."  His point is the truth should be cherished and defended.  It shouldn't be compromised for relevance.  "An understanding and appreciation of biblical truth is a hallmark of a genuine believer, " MacArthur writes. 

     Col. Nathan Jessup famously yelled at Lt. Daniel Kaffee: "you can't handle the truth."   

Sadly, that seems to be where many Americans are. 

Homeless problem is more complex than having OHP haul off trash!

 Weekly Opinion Editorial

KICK THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD

by Steve Fair

 

     In 2024, SB#1854, authored by Senators Weaver, (R-Moore), Shane Jett, (R-Shawnee), Cody Rogers, (R-Catoosa), and Rep. Chris Kannady, (R-Moore), was signed into law.  It made it a crime to have a homeless encampment on state owned property.  On Thursday, Governor Kevin Stitt announced the creation of Operation SAFE (Swift Action for Families Everywhere).  SAFE's first act was to clear homeless camps in Tulsa set up on state owned property inside Tulsa city limits.  On Friday, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP) removed 5 truckloads of debris from 21 homeless camps across Tulsa.  The camps were closed down, apparently without notice.  Illegal immigrants were arrested and turned over to ICE.   Tulsa County Sheriff Vic Regalado, whose jail facilities are near capacity, said:  "I think we're missing the point in all of this. We can't incarcerate ourselves out of homelessness."

     When he announced the action, Stitt said it wasn't his job to deal with Tulsa's homeless problem, but Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols and Tulsa leadership 'have not met the level of action needed to keep neighborhoods safe.'  Mayor Nichols fired back saying: “Kevin Stitt has shown himself again to be an unserious person. I am not interested in being lectured by someone who has proven time and time again that he only cares to intervene to score political points.” Nichols is a former four-term Democrat state representative who is a regular critic of Stitt. Three observations:

     First, homelessness is a national issue.  An estimated 770,000 people are homeless in America.  That is up nearly 20% in the last two years.  One in four homeless in the US are in California.  The rising cost of housing is a factor, but a high percentage of homeless are mentally ill or drug users.  Some people who experience homelessness are employed in low-wage jobs and can't afford a place to live, but some are homeless for reasons known only to them.       

     Second, it's not a crime to be homeless.  The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oklahoma rightly pointed that out after the governor's decree.  The ACLU solution is for the overtaxed/overworked to give the homeless a hand out and turn them into permanent dependents for the taxpayer.  Many homeless don't identify as victims.  They simply dropped out of society because they wanted out of the rat race.  They want to be left alone.  When their independence intrudes on other citizen's liberty, then something has to be done.  Homeless camps in Tulsa had become areas for drug use, crime and unsanitary conditions.  While it's not a crime to live without a home, it is a crime to not respect a fellow citizen's property.    

     Third, there is not a 'right to roam,' in the U.S.  In many countries of the world, public land can be used by the public for reactional purposes.  In early America, allowing public access to government land was a given and the concept was considered for inclusion in the U.S. Constitution.  While public lands are generally accessible, most have restrictions and charge fees.  

     In a June 2024 case (City of Grants Pass vs. Johnson), the U.S. Supreme Court held local governments can criminalize public camping and sleeping for people experiencing homelessness.  The Court reasoned camping bans address behavior, not homelessness as a status.  

     Government is good at implementing short-term fixes and avoiding the core problem.  The homeless problem in Oklahoma is more complex than hauling off trash and running people off public land.  Stitt's action did little more than 'kick the can down the road.' Stitt, Nichols and other local leaders in the Sooner state should work with non-government organizations to determine the root cause of homelessness.  Treating symptoms and not the root cause will just relocate the problem, not fix it.