Weekly Opinion Editorial

GRADING THEIR OWN TESTS!
by Steve Fair

The Oklahoma Tax Commission last week released a report that examined the 2009 impact of the state’s Small Business Capital Formation Incentive Act as well as the Rural Venture Capital Formation Incentive Act. These tax credit programs stated objective was to create jobs for Oklahomans. According to the report, the two programs cost Oklahoma taxpayers more than $550,000 per job. In comparison, Solyndra cost federal taxpayers $486,000 per job.

*****
According to State Representative Mike Reynolds, (R-Oklahoma City), “This is just more proof that the government should not try to pick winners and losers in the marketplace. The track record of government officials displays why legislators, other government officials, and employees in the various departments who make the decisions to give away this money aren’t in the private sector. This money should have been used for roads, schools, or constitutional incentives like across-the-board tax cuts.”

*****
The Small Business Capital Formation Incentive Act provides up to a 30 percent tax credit of qualified investments made in certain small business capital companies or investments made “in conjunction” with those ventures.

*****
The Tax Commission report found that of the $158 million in total tax credits generated through the program in 2008 and 2009, only $41 million has currently been claimed, leaving at least $117 million in potential revenue reductions for the next budget year. Of the 99 total jobs created by the program, over half were at the Patriot Golf Course, a private golf course in the Tulsa area.

*****
State Representative David Dank, (R-Oklahoma City) is the chairman of the Task Force on State Tax Credits and Economic Incentives. He and Reynolds agree that a 2010 AG’s opinion that some of the tax credits in the two programs were unconstitutional because they failed the ‘accountability’ test should sent up a red flag and put a stop to them, but it didn’t.

*****
In the 2010 opinion, then Attorney General Drew Edmondson said for the credits to be legal, they had to serve a public purpose, provide more benefit than cost, and include adequate controls and safeguards.

*****
Dank believes many state tax-credit programs fail the third test involving safeguards. “We have reviewed enough of these tax credits so far to know that the controls and safeguards in place are often a joke,” Dank said. “In many cases, they are nonexistent.” In other words, these programs had no oversight- no one was watching to make sure they were not being abused. Why has there not been any ‘accountability’ for these two programs?

*****
Oklahoma has the office of State Auditor and Inspector. The state constitution states the Auditor’s duties include examining the state and all county treasurer's books, accounts and cash on hand or in bank and to publish an annual report with the results of those examinations.

*****
You would think the State Auditor’s office could audit any agency or program that receives state money, but that is not true. The office is limited by statue from looking at certain agencies books. You would also think that any honestly administrated publically funded program would welcome an annual outside audit by the Auditor’s office.

*****
But there are two problems. First, some agencies and programs don’t want the taxpayers to know how and where tax money is being spent. They know taxpayers would be outraged and demand reform, so they conduct ‘internal’ audits that are designed to make them look good. They account for the money, but no ‘performance’ audit is conducted. A performance audit differs from a regular audit because it examines whether tax dollars were spent economically, efficiently and effectively. Agencies and programs shouldn’t be grading their own tests. An objective set of eyes should be auditing their books.

*****
Second, audits are expensive. Expanding the reach of the Auditor’s office would cost money, requiring the legislature to increase the Auditor’s budget, but if we are truly concerned about accountability, this would be a good investment for taxpayers.

*****
The so-called Venture Capital programs mentioned were supposed to create permanent jobs for Oklahomans, but they appear to have done nothing but give tax credits to wealthy investors. The long term answer is to expand the State Auditor’s authority to audit any agency, program or group that gets a penny of state money or receives a reduction in their tax obligations.

Weekly Opinion Editorial

DON’T MESS WITH OUR RIGHTS!

by Steve Fair

Qui tam lawsuits are essentially a civil lawsuit filed on behalf of the government by a private citizen for fraud on or false claims submitted to the government. The individual bringing the qui tam lawsuit, called the "relator," is often a whistleblower with personal knowledge about a past or ongoing fraud scheme. If the qui tam lawsuit is successful, the whistleblower is entitled to a share in the recovery. Qui tam is Latin for ‘he who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself.” Qui tam lawsuits were used in colonial times, and were embraced by the first U.S. Congress as a way to enforce the laws when the new federal government had virtually no law enforcement officers.
*****
Close to half of the states have enacted Qui Tam laws modeled on the federal False Claims Act to combat fraud against state and local governments. Most of the reforms deal with Medicare and Medicade fraud.
*****

State Senator Rob Johnson, (R-Kingfisher) authored SB 331, which increases the number of signatures required for "qui tam" lawsuits against government in Oklahoma. Currently it takes only ten taxpayers to file a suit to stop a questionable government action in Oklahoma. SB 331 increased that number to one hundred registered voters or 2.5% of the registered voters in the district involved. It also limits the amount a citizen can be awarded from a Qui tam lawsuit to attorney fees and court costs. Currently citizens who bring Qui tam lawsuits can share up to fifty percent of the court’s award.

*****
Senator Johnson says the increase will make it more difficult for a small group of disgruntled citizens to stop a government project. He believes the increases to be reasonable. Evidently his colleagues in the Senate agreed, passing SB331 by a vote of 43-0. The measure passed the House by a vote of 65-34. See House votes at http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/rollcall/64856

*****
On Thursday, Oklahoma City attorney Jerry Fent filed a lawsuit directly with the Oklahoma Supreme Court seeking to stop SB331 from taking effect on November 1st. Fent says the law will make it more difficult for taxpayers to stop government corruption. Fent named only Governor Fallin in the suit since she signed the bill.

*****
Fent has a history of suing government when he disagrees with their actions. He has been called both a watchdog and a nutcase by various groups. Fent sued the state in June of this year over the state budget. In 2010, he won a lawsuit against the state when the State Supreme Court ruled 6-2 in his favor after he successfully argued the legislature could not collect ‘a fee’ from one area and use it somewhere else. In that case, it was a clear violation of SQ 640 and the state constitution.

*****
Fent has also argued before the State Supreme Court the current Judicial Nominating Committee is unconstitutional because it operates from old historical congressional lines and not the new lines. He lost that argument in February. He argued unsuccessfully in 2009 that Oklahoma’s acceptance of federal stimulus money was not handled properly.

*****
No one should be able to get rich by suing taxpayers. The provision to limit awards to only attorney fees and court costs is needed reform, but raising the number of discontented citizens necessary to file a suit against the state from 10 to 100 is too much. It appears this bill may have been targeted at Fent and like-minded individuals who file frequent lawsuits against government, but when legislators ‘target’ a citizen because he uses his ‘right’ too much, they hurt all of us. The average citizen must have a mechanism to appeal laws that are not well thought out.

*****
Taxpayer lawsuits against government do cost taxpayers money, are sometimes frivolous and take up valuable time for courts, but we need them left in the tool chest. Let’s hope Fent wins this battle in the Supreme Court. In this case, he is battling for all of us.

Weekly Opinion EditorialOklahoma Prison Overcrowding a growing issue!
by Steve Fair

Last legislative session, HB 2131, authored by Speaker of the House Kris Steele, (R-Shawnee) and State Senator Patrick Anderson, (R-Enid) was approved overwhelmingly by both chambers of the legislature, passing the House by an 84-7 margin and the Senate 44-3. It was signed into law on May 11th by Governor Fallin and was scheduled to go into effect November 1st.

*****
The motive behind HB 2131 was Oklahoma’s prison overcrowding. According to Speaker Steele, “Our prisons are near capacity. Currently, if someone is convicted and considered a danger to society, there is virtually no place to put them.”
*****
HB 2131 changed the default sentencing structure from consecutive to concurrent terms, enhanced eligibility for community service and GPS monitor sentencing, and reduced the Governor’s role in the parole process for non-violent offenders.

*****
While the idea was good, the new law hit a snag last week when Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt said HB 2131 was unconstitutional. Pruitt’s opinion states that it violates the Oklahoma Constitution for the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board to grant parole without action by the governor. The statute provision that provided that, in cases involving nonviolent offenders, a parole recommendation by the Pardon and Parole Board is deemed approved if the governor does not take action on it within a 30-day period.

*****
While an Attorney General’s opinion is not binding on state officials, it appears the legislature and the Governor will defer to Pruitt’s judgment and start over next session.

*****
Oklahoma is the only state that requires the Governor to approve every parole after the Pardon and Parole Board submits a recommendation. That does seem unnecessary and redundant when you consider the Governor appoints the majority of the board. The Board is composed of five appointive members. Three are appointed by the Governor, one by the Chief Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and one by the Presiding Judge of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. The five members serve four year terms that run concurrent with the term of the Governor.

*****
Like governors before her, Fallin supports the reforms in HB 2131 and was disappointed by Pruitt’s opinion. “It will be up to the legislature to once again look and see where they want to move from this point on, Fallin said. “I do support going to a vote of the people.”

*****
State Senator Harry "Turn" Coates, (R-Seminole) has filed Senate Joint Resolution 46 that would remove the governor totally from the parole process- violent and non-violent offenders. Coates’ says it will allow the Governor to focus on the state's budget and other official business. If it passes both chambers, it would still have to be approved by Oklahoma voters.

*****
"The Legislature took a step in the right direction this session passing House Bill 2131, but we need to do more to speed up the parole process and make it more efficient,” said "Turn" Coates, R-Seminole. “The Pardon and Parole Board is a group of highly qualified experts with backgrounds in criminal justice. Giving the Board complete control over the pardon and parole process will save the state money and allow the Governor to focus more time on her primary responsibilities, which are finding ways to strengthen the state’s economy, help attract new businesses to our state and improve the lives of our citizens.”

*****
Coates' proposal goes too far by totally eliminating the governor from the process. The governor is the ‘elected’ representative of the people charged with specific duties- one of which is to deal with pardons and paroles. No appointed body should be granted that much power. While efficiency is a desired characteristic of government, accountability is more important.

*****
Oklahoma’s prisons are being filled up with non-violent offenders. The Sooner state locks up more women per capita than any other state. More than two thirds of the women in Oklahoma prisons were convicted of nonviolent crimes (mostly drugs) and have children that become the responsibility of extended family or state taxpayers.

*****
According to the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, about 20,000 Oklahomans are convicted of felonies annually. The current population in Oklahoma prisons is about 26,000- 60% of those who are there for nonviolent crimes.

*****
Steele is on the right track by attempting to ease prison overcrowding. With the cost to Oklahoma taxpayers to lock up criminals now at over 600 million annually (almost 10% of the state budget), and growing this is an issue that demands immediate attention.

Weekly Opinion Editorial

Oklahoma needs Open & Campus Carry!

by Steve Fair

In 1995 Oklahoma passed the Self Defense Act aka the Conceal & Carry law. Since that time over 107,000 Oklahomans have taken the course and received a license to carry a weapon. There have been only 30 revocations, 85 suspensions related to felony arrests, and about 15 suspensions per year for failure to conceal. Licensed C&C holders represent about 2.8% of the population of the Sooner state.

*****
Last week, State Representative Mark McCullough, (R-Sapulpa), convened an interim study to review Oklahoma’s gun laws. “We are conducting a serious, thoughtful examination of Oklahoma’s gun laws,” McCullough said. “Our goal is to develop responsible proposals for expanding the right to carry firearms in self-defense.”

*****
During the study, members of the House Public Safety Committee heard testimony from Oklahoma City University law professor Michael O’Shea, a nationally recognized expert on the Second Amendment. O’Shea said Oklahoma’s Self Defense Act is unreasonably harsh in its concealment provision. The Oklahoma law states that the gun must be completely concealed from view and detection, meaning even accidental exposure of the weapon is a crime.

*****
Tim Gillespie, an official with Oklahomans for the Second Amendment urged lawmakers to amend state law to allow gun owners to openly carry a weapon on their own private property, saying such restrictions are unreasonable.

*****
During the study, legislators considered at a wide range of issues, including modifying the weapons permitting process, open carry, and possible constitutional issues that may need to be addressed in light of certain court rulings.

*****
It’s legal to conceal and carry in 49 of the 50 states. Only Illinois does not allow a citizen to carry a gun. Seems a little ironic because Chicago has one of the highest gun related crime rates in America, yet it’s ‘illegal’ to carry a gun in Chicago. The old adage is right- ‘when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.’ Rocker Ted Nugent, an outspoken advocate for the Second Amendment, says, "If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective."

*****
Concealed handgun laws have reduced violent crime in America for two reasons. First, it reduces the number of attempted crimes because criminals are uncertain which potential victims can defend themselves. Second, victims who have guns are in a much better position to defend themselves from criminals.

*****
The upcoming Oklahoma legislature should consider two improvements to gun laws in Oklahoma:

*****
First, Oklahoma should have Open Carry. While many believe open carry would frighten people so gun toters should be considerate and “cover up” for the fearful’s sake, that argument doesn’t take into account the right of the gun owner to defend themself. A second argument against open carry is it makes you a target and that criminals will come after you if they see your gun. In a Department of Justice poll of violent criminals 57% said they fear a law abiding citizen with a gun more than they fear the police. The final and most compelling argument for open carry is that criminals do not openly carry their firearms. While law abiding people must conceal their firearms, it is also the preferred method of carry for criminals. It is not the gun you can see that is to be feared…it is the one you don’t see coming.

*****
The real purpose of passing open carry is to fix the ‘causal exposure’ problem that currently exists in Oklahoma’s law. This proposal failed to get past a Republican controlled House committee in the 2011 legislative session after being passed by both chambers and vetoed by the Governor in 2010.

*****
Second, Oklahoma should have Campus Conceal. There are no significant differences between carrying a concealed handgun on a college campus and carrying a concealed handgun in an office building, shopping mall, restaurant, grocery store, bank, or movie theater. Currently only Utah allows C&C license holders to carry on campus at their public colleges/universities. Fifteen states allow the individual schools to make the call, but only a couple of schools allow it.

*****
It seems some liberal educators are afraid students will pull their weapon after a tough test and plug them. According to concealcampus.org, since 2006 of the nine degree-offering public colleges in Utah not one single gun incident, including threats and suicide has occurred. Efforts to get this passed in Oklahoma have failed the past two legislative sessions after higher education administrators lobbied against it.

*****
Legal age Oklahoma college students should be allowed to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms on campus. These ‘gun free’ zones don’t work- ask Chicago. Former Vice President Walter Mondale, a Democrat, said, “Gun bans don't disarm criminals, gun bans attract them.”
Oklahoma legislators should be protecting citizen’s rights to defend themselves. The original intent and purpose of the Second Amendment was to preserve and guarantee, not grant, the pre-existing right of individuals to keep and bear arms.

Weekly Opinion EditorialHITTING THE WALL!
by Steve Fair

The U.S. debt ceiling- the legal limit on government borrowing- has been in the news lately, but little or nothing has been said about the looming US debt wall- the point in which the percent of government debt to America’s GDP begins to affect our economy. An Oklahoman is trying to change that.
****
On Sunday’s Fox News ‘Huckabee,’ Marc Nuttle from Norman, Oklahoma was interviewed by the Governor about the debt crisis in the US and across the world. Marc is an attorney based in Norman, Oklahoma, who specializes in international trade, international foreign policy and international political affairs. Nuttle is widely recognized for his expertise in forecasting political and economic trends. He represents corporations, business projects and political entities nationally and internationally.
*****
Nuttle is heading up an organization known as Debt Wall (http://debtwall.org/). At DW, they contend there is a limited amount of money that the world’s sovereign governments can borrow in any single given year without pressuring interest rates to rise above the point of affordability. They believe that limit is approximately 9% of the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) and the US will hit the wall by July 31, 2012. The Debt Wall Index is a countdown to this collision. Based on current projections of economic growth and government spending, Nuttle and his organization believe the US will hit the Debt Wall by July 31, 2012.

*****
Marc’s reasoning is this: The current U.S. spending deficit is about $1.67 trillion. The spending deficits of the rest of the nations in the world run another $9 trillion or so. Combined, there simply is not enough liquid capital in the world to fund $10 trillion in deficits at an interest rate taxpayer anywhere can actually afford.

*****
Nuttle believes that once the world governments run out of ready money to borrow — they’ll pursue other means like raising interest rates to pull investors and their equity from other markets. They’ll also turn up the presses and print more money, devaluing their currencies and causing inflation. During inflationary times, the middle and lower income earners always feel the biggest pinch.

*****
At debtwall.org, Nuttle has a top ten list of things you need to know about the looming debt crisis in America. http://debtwall.org/debt-crisis-index-what-you-need-to-know/ To summarize the ten points he is simply saying if we don’t get our debt under control, our lives will change dramatically from an economic standpoint once we hit the Debt Wall.

*****
On ‘Huckabee’ the Governor noted that if Nuttle’s projected date of July 31st of next year is correct then America will be in the midst of the 2012 presidential campaign when the wall is hit. “Isn’t it in the best interest of both Parties to deal with the debt issue?” Huckabee asked. “Certainly,” Nuttle replied. “The nation’s debt wall is not a partisan issue.”

*****
It isn’t a partisan issue, but it certainly seems that way. When you consider how difficult was to get the debt ceiling compromise through the House, it would seem many in Washington mistakenly believe we have a revenue problem, not a spending problem.

*****
Dave Ramsey broke down the US federal budget and debt to levels that we can better understand when he said the cuts Congress was like a family making 58K a year, spending 75K a year and have over 327K in credit card debt. The family decides to fix it, by reducing their annual spending to $72K. While the cuts got them going in the right direction, it reveals a complete disregard of the fact their deficit spending is not sustainable long-term. Even if they act now, some believe it might be too late.

*****
A month ago Peter Leeds of Penny Stocks, wrote in an op/ed http://augustafreepress.com/2011/08/15/peter-leeds-past-the-point-of-no-return/that America is past the point of no return on dealing with the national debt issue. “You've certainly heard the endless stream of negative economic news lately. America's fiscal house is in trouble, job growth has stalled, and we may be driving right into a double-dip recession. While giving their pessimistic economic outlooks, there is one thing that the doomsayers have gotten wrong - they aren't nearly worried enough. We've past the point of no return. In both America and globally, in less than two years, our societies will look very different, and possibly be almost unrecognizable. I expect very strong inflation, fueled by loose monetary policies and an unprecedented period of near zero interest rates,” Leeds predicted. Not a very rosy picture.

*****
If Leeds assessment is correct and the debt wall projection by Nuttle’s group is accurate, America may be in for a long period of economic recession, but until a majority in Washington starts slamming on the brakes and not just lightly tapping them, it appears the US will hit the wall like a crash test car. The problem is the American economy is in the car, not the dummies that got us there.

Weekly Opinion Editorial

LESS GOVERNMENT, NOT LESS REPRESENTATION!
by Steve Fair

State Representative Gary Banz, (R-Midwest City) is conducting an interim study next week to look at reducing the number of members of the Oklahoma Legislature by approximately ten percent.
*****
“As lawmakers, we constantly talk about the need for smaller government,” said Banz, a retired coach and educator. “My legislation lets legislators prove it in a way that shows we are truly committed to reducing the size of government.”
*****
If both chambers of the legislature approve Banz’s House Joint Resolution 1021, voters in November 2012 would have the opportunity to approve a constitutional amendment reducing the Oklahoma Legislature membership. The proposal would cut the number of seats in the Oklahoma House of Representatives from 101 to 91, and reduce the number of state senators from 48 to 43. If approved by the voters, t would not take effect until after the next redistricting- 2021.
*****
“I believe the Legislature needs to look at itself first,” Banz said. “If we ask agencies to consolidate, it is important for the Legislature to take the lead and do the same.”
*****
In 1921, Oklahoma’s population was just over two million and there were 92 seats in the Oklahoma House of Representatives. Each State Representative represented about 22,000 Oklahomans. In 1953, there were 124 members in the State House and the population was 2.2 million in the Sooner state and each lawmaker represented about 17,000 people.
*****
“The House has successfully operated with far fewer members in the past, and the chamber has also successfully downsized in the past,” Banz said. “History shows this idea is very feasible.”
*****
“This would be a significant change, and I want to solicit input from every corner of Oklahoma,” Banz said. “I think this is good policy, but also believe it should be carefully vetted.” You can express your opinion by contacting Banz’s office at 405.557.7395.
*****
Three observations about Banz’s proposal:
*****
First, you will get little argument Oklahoma state government is too big. When you consider the largest employer in the state is state government, lawmakers should to be seeking ways to downsize government and save taxpayers money. But just how much money would Banz’s proposal save?
*****
Rank and file Oklahoma state legislators make $38,500 annually and then there are expenses, benefits, and staff for each member. The savings resulting from eliminating fifteen district would likely be around a million a year- not an amount to be sneezed at, but when the Oklahoma state budget is 6.7 billion annually, the savings from this proposal are virtually insignificant.
*****
Second, are Oklahomans currently over represented? Oklahoma’s population in 2011 is 3.75 million. That means an Oklahoma State Representative has slightly over 37,000 population in their district- a State Senator around 75,000. Today’s legislators represent over twice the population a 1950s legislator represented. If the number of legislators were reduced, it would make it even more difficult for citizens to get to know their state legislator. It would also increase the amount of geography each lawmaker would represent. The more sparsely populated areas in a district would get likely little or no attention as legislators would ‘fish where the fish are.’
*****
Third, Banz’s proposal would hurt rural Oklahoma. A large percentage of Oklahoma’s population lives in the urban areas of the state. If the number of state legislators is reduced, those larger population areas would gain more power and rural areas would lose representation. In the 2011 redistricting, rural Oklahoma lost three House seats and one Senate seat to the urban areas. You can’t change the dynamic of population shifting to the urban areas, but if the total number of legislators is reduced, the influence of rural Oklahoma counties will be reduced proportionally.
*****
While I applaud Banz’s willingness to save taxpayers money, reduction of the number of legislators will not result in enough savings to really matter. It would make access to state lawmakers more difficult than it is now, and dilute the influence of rural Oklahoma. Oklahomans need less government, but we don’t need less representation.

Weekly Opinion Editorial

Feeding the Education Machine!
by Steve Fair

Governor Mary Fallin said last week she wants Oklahoma to produce 1,700 more college graduates a year. “We need a much higher number of college-educated graduates in our state,” Fallin said at an OSU town hall meeting. Currently Oklahoma produces about 27,000 college degrees a year.
*****
In “ Brain Gain 2010,” a 1999 strategy by the Oklahoma Regents for Higher Education, http://www.okhighered.org/studies-reports/brain-gain/braingainreport.pdf, the lofty goal of thirty eight percent of Oklahoma’s population was set by the Regents to have completed an Associate degree or higher by 2010. They failed to reach the goal- only about 20% of Oklahoma’s workforce has a college degree.
*****
The higher education lobby in Oklahoma has been very successful at feeding the education machine, but they have done little to improve the states per capita income. In fiscal year 2012, Oklahoma higher education will get 14.5% of the state budget.
*****
State Representative Corey Holland, (R-Marlow) wants higher education to be more accountable for the money they get from the taxpayers. Holland said in a June 2nd interview with The Duncan Banner http://duncanbanner.com/x775914909/Holland-hones-in-on-education-reform that he believes that higher education should be scruntized more. “I still think there are some areas that we really need to look at,” Holland said. “One of those is the spending that occurs in the higher education areas. “Essentially, all the other state agencies, when they incur cuts, they make cuts. They live in the reality of the economic climate. Colleges and universities, though, when they cut their budgets cut, they raise the prices for tuition. They pass it on to the students. There needs to be a lot more accountability on higher ed.”
*****
Of Oklahoma’s common education superintendents, more than two hundred make more than $100,000 annually. In contrast, Holland, a former teacher, said more than 2,000 higher education employees make more than $100,000 annually. “That’s just ridiculous,” Holland said. “It’s because there is not enough ability for the legislature to provide adequate oversight on their spending. If that doesn’t change, it’s going to continue to be a detriment of K-12 schools statewide.”
*****
Holland is correct that higher education has a funding mechanism that state agencies don’t have. Their consumer- the student- pays a large portion of the cost of their education. Colleges and universities just increase tuition to make up for the budget shortfall. They seldom lay off Profs or administration- they just take a price increase in tuition. At the town hall meeting in Stillwater, Fallin failed to mention that when the Oklahoma legislature cut higher eds budget this year (by 6%), OSU, OU and other state college students got a +4.8% tuition increase. An in-state OSU student is paying about $500 more this year, making the yearly tuition about $7,200.

*****
At the town hall meeting, Fallin agreed that asking State colleges and universities to produce more graduates would logically lead to a call for more higher education funding, but she did not commit to asking the legislature to increase higher eds budget, saying that savings should be squeezed out of ‘other areas.’
******
Fallin also announced that Oklahoma would participate in the “Complete College America” http://www.completecollege.org/program, a program whose stated goal is, “to significantly increase the number of Americans with a college degree or credential of value and to close attainment gaps for traditionally underrepresented populations.” Funded by several foundations, including the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, correctly state that while Americans are starting college at a record level, the graduation rates are flat.
*****
Oklahoma colleges already have a ‘Reach Higher’ http://www.okhighered.org/reachhigher/ program that encourages older students to complete their college degree online. The Reach Higher courses are repetitive and not very practical and while the ‘Reach Higher’ marketing brochure touts completion of the program as a stepping-stone to a better life, more pay, and personal satisfaction, little or no placement services are offered to graduates of the program. Like many higher education programs, it’s all about the tuition money.
*****
Educating Oklahomans is a worthy lofty goal, but is only one part of the puzzle. If Oklahoma college graduates don’t have a place to work when they get out of school, then Oklahoma colleges and universities are nothing more than a taxpayer funded business enterprise producing a product for other states and their industries. The key is moving Oklahoma forward is creating a business environment that will attract business and industry for those completing their education.
*****
Fallin said the future of Oklahoma’s prosperity depends on education. The reality is Oklahoma’s prosperity- humanly speaking- is dependent upon our marketing our state’s geographic location, citizen work ethic, natural resources and lifestyle. Just feeding an Oklahoma higher education machine is not the answer to moving Oklahoma forward.