Weekly Opinion Editorial
AFTER ALL, IT’S YOUR MONEY!
Tracking college graduation rates started in the late 1980s
when then U.S. Senator and former NBA star Bill Bradley sponsored a proposal to
have the NCAA release graduation rates for college athletics. That was expanded to all college students
soon thereafter. An institution’s
graduation rate has become a standard measurement of the quality of education a
student will receive at an institution of higher learning.
Colleges that continue to do poorly in graduation rates
offer a variety of excuses. But the most plausible one is the rate depends on
the types of students an institution admits.
*****While it is true that graduation rates alone don't determine the quality of a degree, often students who start college but don't finish are typically no better off than those who never even started. In fact, they may be worse off, if they took on debt. Given the subsidies they give to colleges, federal and state governments have a stake in making sure that students finish what they started. And a college credential remains one of the only signals to the job market that a potential employee is ready.
*****
"In a society that cares about the credential, finishing college matters," maintains Mark Schneider, a former
*****
Four observations concerning
*****
First, why is it acceptable that less than half of the
students who start college in Oklahoma
complete a degree? While it’s certain we
don't want to end up with the higher-ed version of No Child Left Behind, where
the jobs and salaries of individual faculty members are dependent on the
academic success of their students, we do need to demand accountability from
Oklahoma’s higher education system on the product they produce and the taxpayer
money they receive. After all, it’s your money.
Second, do we need an institution of higher learning every
thirty miles in Oklahoma ? It seems the twentieth century model of
building physical satellite campuses is outdated, not to mention expensive. With more and more college classes being
offered on-line and virtual classrooms being heralded as the future of common
and higher education, why are Oklahoma
taxpayers paying for more brick and mortar buildings? Shouldn’t the legislature force Oklahoma ’s higher
education institutions to begin the task of re-inventing themselves and moving
to a ‘virtual classroom’ model to prepare for the future? After all, it’s your money.
Third, why does every taxpayer funded college in Oklahoma have a separate President and other
administrators that earn more money that most CEOs of private companies in Oklahoma ? Does every state college and university need
an individual President? Why can’t a
President oversee more than one institution?
The private sector has been forced to do more with less and to become
more efficient-why not Oklahoma
colleges and universities? If you want
to find out how much any taxpayer funded state employee(including college
Presidents) is paid in Oklahoma ,
go to, https://data.ok.gov/. You’re not snooping- it’s a matter of public
record. After all, it’s your money.
Fourth, higher education receives a large percentage (14%)of
the Oklahoma
state budget, but is not subject to oversight and auditing by the Oklahoma
State Auditor’s office. That’s
ridiculous. Every agency, organization,
college, school or entity that receives one penny of Oklahoma taxpayer money should be
accountable to the people who gave them that money. A through performance audit should be
conducted annually on higher education to insure taxpayer dollars are being
spent as intended. This authorization
would require legislative approval or a vote of the people, but it is long
overdue. The Presidents of the State
Colleges should be request an audit be done to show Oklahoma taxpayers they are getting their
moneys worth. After all, it’s your
money.
No comments:
Post a Comment