Weekly Opinion Editorial
ROAD LESS
TRAVELED!
By Steve Fair
There is little debate that Oklahoma
roads and bridges are in need of repair.
After decades of neglect, the state legislature has done a good job at
prioritizing the order of repair and providing the funding to complete the
job. The legislature gets most of the money to fix our roads and bridges through state fuel tax. Oklahomans pay only seventeen cents
a gallon in fuel tax, 46th in the U.S. In New
York, drivers pay over fifty cents a gallon. With gasoline and diesel prices at record
levels, citizens are not willing to add to the price of the pump even to help
pay for repairs to roads and bridges.
That coupled with the fact that more fuel efficient vehicles are
generating billions less in revenue each year have presented a challenge to
state governments.
Technology has compounded the problem of financing roadwork. Cars now
get higher gas mileage, use less gas and pay less gas taxes. The new clean
fuel-Compressed Natural Gas- (CNG) is taxed at a much lower rate than
gasoline. Electric cars and Hybrids use little or no gas, but they don’t contribute
their share to the cost of maintaining roads.
Some creative thinkers have come up
with a new concept. It’s called the
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) tax. It is
a policy of taxing motorists based on how many miles they travel and replaces
the fuel tax. A VMT charge is
implemented using GPS units on board a vehicle to record distance, assign it to
the appropriate taxing jurisdiction, and calculate the amount owed. VMT charges are based on vehicle class, when
the vehicle is driven and the type road surface they drive on. Holland and Denmark plan to
implement the VMT. Oregon is the only state that has said the
VMT was viable. They have asked for
5,000 drivers to volunteer to join the program. We'll see how many citizens want Uncle Sam tracking their travel.
Three observations:
First, while VMT may be a fair and equitable way to impose a fuel tax,
it is too intrusive. We don’t want
government placing a GPS tracking devise on our vehicles. VMT would also penalize rural residents in
states like Oklahoma. The long term affect would be larger
metropolitan areas and fewer rural residents.
While VMT is a true ‘use’ tax, it is not the solution to Oklahoma’s road and
bridge funding challenges.
Second, the reason most elected officials ignore roads and bridges is because
building them is a long term project.
With term limits, oftentimes an elected official is out of office before
a road project in their district is completed.
Politicians like projects that are completed quickly and will help get
them re-elected. Roads and bridges take
too long to help with re-elections.
Third, a lack of road and bridge maintenance revenue is a very real
issue. Oklahoma takes in about $300 million
annually in fuel tax to use on roads/bridges.
That amount has not changed for several years. With increases in construction cost, revenue
is not keeping up with the need. The
simple solution would be to have the residents of the state vote for an
increase in the fuel tax, but that is easier said than done. In September of 2005, Oklahomans rejected SQ
#723 by an 87% margin. It would have
increased the fuel tax to twenty two cents a gallon on gasoline and
diesel. It was the biggest defeat of a
State Question since 1952 when voters rejected a state sales tax increase. Oklahomans believe they are already taxed
enough and they don’t trust politicians who claim they will ‘earmark’ a tax for
a specific purpose. They have been
burned too many times.
The reality is Oklahoma
got behind on road/bridge maintenance during the nearly 100 year reign of terror when Democrats controlled
state government. During that period(1907-2004),
the state’s infrastructure was neglected and ignored. According to a recent report, 22.6% of the
Oklahoma’s bridges are deficient- up from the previous year- and second worst in the country. The same reports
ranked Oklahoma
38th in roads.
At some point,
Oklahomans are going to have we have to face facts and figure out a way to
address our crumbling infrastructure and that may include having to vote
ourselves a tax increase. God forgive a conservative Republican for even mentioning raising taxes.
No comments:
Post a Comment