Weekly Opinion Editorial
D’s HAVE A MAJORITY
IN THE SENATE!
by Steve Fair
The SCOTUS confirmation
hearing for Judge Brett Kavanaugh has now surpassed Judge Robert Bork and
Justice Clarence Thomas’ hearings in absurdity.
With an estimated 20 million Americans watching or listening, Kavanaugh’s
accuser Christine Blasey Ford tearfully testifying he had
sexually assaulted her in high school and Kavanaugh tearfully denying it. Democrats on the Senate Judiciary committee
demanded the FBI investigate Ford’s accusation before the committee vote, but
that was denied and they voted along Party lines to send Kavanaugh’s nomination
to the full Senate, but not without drama.
Senate Jeff Flake, (R-AZ) said he would only vote to move the nomination
along if the Republican leadership would agree to a one week delay to allow the
FBI to investigate and report back. That
was agreed to and at this point, the earliest the Kavanaugh nomination vote on
the Senate floor will happen is mid-October.
First,
Republicans don’t stick together like the Democrats and don’t lead the same way
when they are in the majority. They are
too accommodating to the minority. It’s
fine to allow for a minority voice, but the Senate GOP leadership bends over
backwards for the minority. That was not
the case when the Democrats were in charge.
They largely ignored the Republicans.
The GOP is more accommodating because they need the more moderate members
of the GOP caucus to stick with them in order to get anything done. When GOP Senator’s
Flake, Collins, and Murkowski waffle on supporting a Republican POTUS’s Supreme
Court nominee, Democrats have a practical working majority in the Senate
without winning elections.
Second, this isn’t about Kavanaugh’s fitness to serve on the SCOTUS. It’s about judicial interpretation. Democrats
know if the Constitution is interpreted literally, it presents a challenge to many
liberal rulings past courts have made. That’s
why they are fighting with every ounce of strength to keep Kavanaugh off the
court. Kavanaugh is
an ‘originalist’ in his interpretation
of the Constitution(in the vein of Thomas and Scalia). That means the good judge approaches the
law literally and strictly, with little or no allowance for connotation. The
Democrats prefer judges that are ‘structuralist,’ meaning they approach
interpretation of the law with an abstract view, expanding the meaning beyond
its original meaning to encompass situations not anticipated by the law’s
authors or enactors at the time it was originally written.
Third, the FBI has issues? This agency has an agenda, but Senate Republicans
are going to have them conduct a fair and impartial investigation into a 37
year old incident? Expect the agency to
find something, even if they have to make it up.
Groucho
Marx said: “Those are my principles, and
if you don’t like them….well I have others.” That describes the Senate Democrats;
selective outrage when it benefits their cause, while ignoring creditable
evidence against their own. These hearings have been a
joke and hopefully the American people will see through the Democrat tactics and
keep the GOP in the majority November 6th.
1 comment:
Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you Nevertheless I am experiencing situation with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting equivalent rss downside? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx play casino
Post a Comment