Weekly Opinion Editorial
GRADING MY OWN TEST
by Steve Fair
I always loved grading my own tests in
school. It always seemed both Johnny(my
seatmate) and I got better grades when we graded our own than when the teacher
made us exchange tests for grading. The
recent ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court on a lawsuit by the League of Women
Voters that removed the requirement for notarization of voter absentee ballots
and allows voters to simply ‘self-notarize reminds me of those days grading my own
test.
Election Board Secretary Paul Ziriax said,
“This decision effectively leaves
Oklahoma without a means to verify that the person who signs an absentee ballot
affidavit is the same person to whom the ballot was issued.”
The Oklahoma legislature got busy this
week and quickly passed SB #210. Authored
by Senate President Pro Tempe Greg Treat, (R-OKC) and Speaker of the House
Charles McCall, (R-Atoka), SB#210 reinstated the notary requirement for the
November general election. It also
requires absentee voters in the June 30, 2020 primary election to include a
photocopy of their photo ID with their ballot.
No notary is required. Waiving
the notary requirement for the primary due to the pandemic seems unnecessary
and could promote voter fraud.Three thoughts:
First, Oklahoma has one of the best
election processes in the country. The optical-
scan voting machines utilized in the Sooner state provide a voter-verifiable ‘paper
trail,’ direct recording electronic machines do not. Voter fraud in Oklahoma is rare, but it does
happen. Ten years ago, an Adair county
man, known for being a Democrat activist, was charged with two felony counts of
false affidavit in voting registration and two felony counts of false
notarization of an absentee ballot. He
pled nolo contendere and received a three year deferred sentence. He was essentially charged with signing the
names of two voters on absentee ballots.
If the legislature had not acted as quickly as they did, verification of
who is voting by absentee would have been next to impossible and the
possibility of voter fraud would have been dramatically increased.
Second, the League of Women Voters is a
liberal organization. Originally founded
in 1920 to help women gain the right to vote, it has politically moved far from
that mission. The League now publicly opposes
voter ID laws, supports abortion, universal health care and gun control. Their motivation in opposing notarization of
absentee ballots threatens ballot security.
Every person who is eligible should be afforded the right to vote, but
insuring the identity of the person casting that vote is essential to election integrity.
Third, Democrats in Oklahoma are officially
liberal. The vote on SB #210 was along
Party lines, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing Oklahoma voters
to sign their absentee affidavit in front of a notary. The days of ‘conservative’
Democrats in Oklahoma is gone. The
elected Democrats in the Oklahoma legislature are philosophically in line with
the national Democrats when they in lock step oppose a common sense bill like
SB #210.
Ronald Reagan famously said, “Trust, but
Verify.” That is what SB#210 does. It outlines a process in which voters can
cast their ballots by absentee and verification the voter did the casting of
the ballot. Why would anyone oppose
Voter ID? Because they want to grade
their own test.
No comments:
Post a Comment