Weekly Opinion Editorial
“GIVE ‘EM A BREAK”
by Steve Fair
House Joint Resolution #1047(HJR#1047) is authored by Rep. Robert
Manger, (R-OKC) and Rep. Tammy Townley, (R-Ardmore) in the House and Sen. Adam
Pugh, (R-Edmond) in the Senate. HJR#1047
would send to a vote of the people a proposal freezing the value of a homestead
for individual head of households who are sixty-five (65) years of age or older
to not exceed the fair cash value placed upon the property during the first
year in which the individual head of household turns sixty-five years of age or
older. It would remove the current maximum
income requirement for a senior valuation freeze and make all seniors over 65
eligible. HJR #1047 unanimously passed
the House Rules committee last month.
Critics of the bill, which include the County Assessors Association of
Oklahoma, believe HJR #1047 would give an unnecessary tax break to wealthy
seniors. Proponents of the bill believe
it would help many seniors on a fixed income who need the financial help. Three observations:
First, HJR #1047 is revenue neutral.
That means it wouldn’t cost taxpayers anything. HJR#1047 doesn’t ‘eliminate’ property tax for
those over 65. It simply freezes the value
of the homestead. Seniors would still
pay taxes on their homes, including increases in the millage rate in their
school district. Most senior’s homes are
already assessed at fair market value, so the only loss of tax revenue would be
on the future increases.
Second, the current senior valuation freezing criteria is flawed. The freeze is based on gross household
income, which means a rancher counts the income from selling livestock, but not
the expenses to raise the livestock. The
current system counts all income except veterans’ disability or a gift. It includes income from food stamps,
disability, and non-taxable income. The
maximum allowable income to be eligible for the freeze varies from county to
county and increases each year. Filing
for the freeze ends March 15th. If you have questions on your eligibility,
contact your county assessor’s office before 3/15.
Third, most seniors need the financial help. Some wealthy Oklahoma seniors don’t need the
freeze, but the vast majority of seniors in the Sooner state aren’t wealthy. They are on a fixed income and struggle to
pay their bills.
The Oklahoma Board of Equalization certified $10.49 billion with $9.1
billion available for the 2022 legislature to appropriate ($1.3 billion is
carryover from last year). Ten years ago
(2012), the Oklahoma state budget was $6.8 billion. In one decade, the state budget has increased
by +25%.
Whenever there is a strong budget in Oklahoma, a plethora of state agencies line up to advocate for increases in funding. State employees line up for raises. But the average Oklahoma taxpayer rarely gets a break. HJR#1047 would be a godsent to many seniors raising their grandchildren and struggling to pay property insurance and maintain their homes. The truth is- it isn’t a tax cut at all. HJR #1047 would just put county government on a fixed income like the seniors. What’s good for the goose is good for gander. Contact your state legislator and urge them to support passage of HJR#1047.
No comments:
Post a Comment