Weekly Opinion Editorial
SQ#836 IS FLIM-FLAM!
by Steve Fair
On June 24th,
the Oklahoma Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by the
Oklahoma Republican Party challenging the constitutionality of SQ# 836. Justices did not immediately issue a
ruling. SQ#836 aims to change Oklahoma’s
primary election system from closed primaries to an open system. The OKGOP maintains SQ#836 violates the First
Amendment rights of association by forcing the Party to accept votes from those
not registered with the Party. They
contend political parties have the right to determine who participates in their
nomination process.
Proponents of SQ#836 were represented by
former U.S. Attorney Robert McCampbell.
He pointed out the US Supreme Court has ruled that a top-two primary
system does not violate political party associational rights. Three observations:
First, changing the primary election will
move Oklahoma to the left. The
motivation behind SQ#836 is because Democrats are losing at the ballot
box. D’s tried, with limited success, to
get their candidates to run as Republicans.
That made it difficult for primary voters to identify the sheep from the
goats. The Democrat’s next strategy is
to eliminate branding. They want to make
Party affiliation insignificant. They
want to blur and obscure a candidate’s values/positions so they can get more
progressives elected. SQ#836 is the springboard to a more liberal
state government. No true conservative
is supporting it.
Second, changing the primary election will
promote hijinks. SQ#836 would increase
the practice of candidates deceitfully positioning themselves as a conservative
to win an election. SQ#836 is a Trojan
house. Proponents are selling the fairness/harmless/beneficial
of it, but fail to disclose the hidden danger and malicious intent it actually
promotes. SQ#836 would encourage
candidates to practice deceit and chicanery.
It is already next to impossible to discern the genuine from the bogus
in the current system. Flipping to a
primary where those not registered in a Party can determine the Party’s nominee
is asinine.
Third, changing the primary election will
empower special interests. Proponents of SQ#836 trumpet how it will bring
fairness, equity, and honesty to the primary system. But what is fair about a system where those
who don’t want to be a part of an organization want to tell that organization
how to operate? SQ#836 would draw
special interest money like flies to sugar.
Mass marketing of empty suit light weights would put the power in the
hands of big donors. Trade associations
and industries are already buying legislative seats in Oklahoma. SQ#836 would take it to the next level.
SQ#836 isn’t about fairness. It’s about control. It’s about winning elections. Every registered voter in Oklahoma can already
participate in primary elections. They
just have to register with the Party that aligns with their values. That is just common sense. Outsiders shouldn’t pick a Party’s
nominee. SQ#836 is a scam promoted by
flim-flam artists. Unfortunately, some
of those bilkers have an ‘R’ by their name.
If the Oklahoma Supreme Court rules against the OKGOP, then SQ#836
advocates will start gathering signatures to get it on the ballot. They have to gather 173,000 statewide in a
short window. Oklahomans should decline,
reject, repudiate and spurn requests to put their John Hancock on the petition,
not matter how persuasive the solicitor.
SQ#836 is not OK.
3 comments:
Just the post I was looking for, Steve, though I am a little late. I'm excited to see what you have to say about state question 836.
"The OKGOP maintains SQ#836 violates the First Amendment rights of association by forcing the Party to accept votes from those not registered with the Party." Open primaries were affirmed as constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008. Twenty states have open primaries, including our neighbors Arkansas and Texas.
"First, changing the primary election will move Oklahoma to the left." Oklahoma's Democratic Party has had an open primary system for years. Why not make it fair by leveling the playing field for Oklahoma's Republican Party? Can your party not win a deep-red state on a level playing field?
"The motivation behind SQ#836 is because Democrats are losing at the ballot box. D’s tried, with limited success, to get their candidates to run as Republicans. That made it difficult for primary voters to identify the sheep from the goats." Did you forget about Republican-turned-Democrat Joy Hofmeister?
"The Democrat’s next strategy is to eliminate branding. They want to make Party affiliation insignificant. They want to blur and obscure a candidate’s values/positions so they can get more progressives elected." Didn't George Washington warn us about political parties in his farewell address?
"SQ#836 is the springboard to a more liberal state government. No true conservative is supporting it." Sign me up!
"SQ#836 would increase the practice of candidates deceitfully positioning themselves as a conservative to win an election. SQ#836 is a Trojan house. [and so on and so forth]" Steve, you fail to address the benefit that this proposal would have to your party. The top two primary candidates, *regardless of party affiliation*, would appear on the general election ballot (with the exception of the presidency). Think about that. Your party could have two Republicans on the general election ballot instead of just one!
"Third, changing the primary election will empower special interests. [and so forth]" Have you seen James Lankford's campaign disclosures? The oil and gas industry ranks first in donations by hundreds of thousands of dollars.
"But what is fair about a system where those who don’t want to be a part of an organization want to tell that organization how to operate?" Yes, what is fair about all political parties playing by the same rules? You were saying?
"SQ#836 would draw special interest money like flies to sugar." Or like Republican climate change-deniers to a snowball?
"Mass marketing of empty suit light weights would put the power in the hands of big donors." Is that not already the case, Steve? Has Citizens United taught you nothing of value?
"Every registered voter in Oklahoma can already participate in primary elections. They just have to register with the Party that aligns with their values. That is just common sense." According to you, Steve, that is common sense. I do not believe that you speak for all 4 million+ people in our state.
"Outsiders shouldn’t pick a Party’s nominee." You haven't read the text of the state question, have you, Steve? How embarrassing it must be to be you.
I really am entertained by your blog posts, and I hope you continue to share them online for as long as you have breath on Earth.
Steve,
I respectfully bring to your readers' attention some factual errors in your post.
“The OKGOP maintains SQ#836 violates the First Amendment rights of association by forcing the Party to accept votes from those not registered with the Party. ...parties have the right to determine who participates in their nomination process.”
OKGOP’s principal argument Is false. Primary elections under SQ 836 do not select any party’s nominees. It narrows candidates for the general election to two, regardless of party.
“,,, the US Supreme Court has ruled that a top-two primary system does not violate political party associational rights.”
Yes, the US Supreme Court has made it clear that the single-ballot primary does not select any party’s nominee. (The majority judicial opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas, not exactly a liberal activist judge.)
“Changing the primary election will move Oklahoma to the left.”
Other states that went to a single-ballot primary have seen no significant shift. Strongly Republican districts will likely still elect a Republican candidate.
“The motivation behind SQ#836 is because Democrats are losing at the ballot box. … They want to blur and obscure a candidate’s values/positions so they can get more progressives elected.”
These are false statements. The Democratic Party was not involved in developing the initiative petition, and they have neither endorsed nor opposed it. The petition’s intent is not to help or hinder any party.
The petition was developed by Oklahoma United, a nonpartisan organization. The motivation is to improve our election system. Oklahoma is last in voter participation. Independents feel excluded. Voters often feel their votes don’t count, and our closed primary system bears much of the blame. The winners of about 70% of the state elections that would be affected by SQ 836 are being determined in the primaries.
“SQ#836 is the springboard to a more liberal state government.”
SQ 836 will lead to state and county officials who are more representative of ALL voters, rather than just the current small number of partisan primary voters.
“No true conservative is supporting it.”
If you mean those who believe in the traditional conservative principles of fiscal responsibility, personal freedom, and limited government, then you are wrong. Examples include former Oklahoma US Representative Mickey Edwards, Labor Commissioner Leslie Osborn, OKC mayor David Holt, former Tulsa Mayor G.T. Bynum, and former OK Senator A.J. Griffin.
“SQ#836 would increase the practice of candidates deceitfully positioning themselves as a conservative to win an election.”
Candidates of any political belief can file as a candidate in the closed primary of any political party by indicating that party when they register to vote. Nothing about SQ 836 changes that.
“Flipping to a primary where those not registered in a Party can determine the Party’s nominee is asinine.”
Again, the primary does not choose party nominees. The emphasis will shift from political party power to voting for the best candidates, regardless of party.
“Changing the primary election will empower special interests. ...”
I disagree that SQ 836 would increase the influence that special interests and their money already have.
“Every registered voter in Oklahoma can already participate in primary elections. They just have to register with the Party that aligns with their values.”
Not if the three recognized parties don’t align with your values? That is hw the growing number of Independents feel. No one should be forced to join a party to express their right to vote.
Everyone: make an informed decision after studying the issues. Anyone who hasn’t already read the text of SQ 836 can find it at: https://www.voteyes836.com/
Post a Comment