Weekly Opinion Editorial
SACRIFICING TRUTH
FOR RELEVANCE!
by Steve Fair
Relevant is
defined as being closely connected or
appropriate to what is being done or considered. People want to be relevant. Organizations want to be relevant. If they aren’t relevant, then they believe
they have little or no influence in what is going on. In politics, relevance is coveted like a
tiger after a raw steak. People and organizations involved in politics willingly
sacrifice their values, convictions, and honor on the altar of relevance. To not be relevant means they can’t effect
any change or be involved in policy, but is that true? Three thoughts on relevance:
First, truth should be the ultimate
goal, not relevance. Sadly too
many people fail because they will either not work with those that disagree
with them or they fail to use persuasive skills to convince others of the
merits of their argument. When their
position is rebuffed, they make themselves irrelevant by isolating themselves
and placing themselves on the throne of self-righteousness. They whine instead of engaging. They plead martyrdom. A true warrior doesn’t worry about relevance-
they stay focused on the battle. They
don’t curse the darkness- they light a candle.
General Stonewall Jackson famously said: “The battle is ours-the outcome is Gods’.”
Second, real relevance is derived from
years of proven performance. In
every election cycle, various political groups pop up advocating for a particular
policy. They are often effective for
that cycle, but their relevance quickly fades. Their short shelf life relevance appeals to
low-information, infrequent voters because they haven’t taken time to study
issues. These groups are more about the
marketing than meticulousness. True relevance
requires years of consistent investment in time, talent and treasure.
Third, who determines relevance in politics? It is not political Party leadership, elected
officials, pollsters and big donors that determine who and what is relevant in
politics. Voters do. There are so many low information voters in
America, relevance in politics has derailed authenticity. If long term change is the true goal, educating
voters on policy and their government should be paramount. Teaching citizens about their government and
the issues and policies that affect their lives is critical if our country is
to survive.
Relevance that
effects long term change flows out of tenacious, purposeful, persistent hard
work. It is consistent and doesn’t get
distracted. It’s not flashy or self-promoting,
but it is enthusiastic. It walks the
walk. It is rooted in truth. Sadly, few are willing to commit to the
battle that ultimately leads to relevance and that is why the US is in the
shape it is in. Winston Churchill said, “Success is stumbling from failure to
failure with no loss of enthusiasm.” The long term relevant often fail, but they
continue the journey. They don’t quit
because their goal is truth, not fleeting relevance. Don’t you think it is time you got engaged in
your government- for your children and grandchildren’s sake?
No comments:
Post a Comment