Americans need to recommit to a Republic form of government!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

TRUE DEMOCRACY IS MOB RULE!

by Steve Fair

     As the story goes, Benjamin Franklin was walking out of Independence Hall after the Constitutional Convention in 1787, when someone asked him, ”Dr. Franklin, what have we got- a republic or a monarchy?”  Franklin supposedly responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”  233 years later America may be losing the republic Franklin and the founders crafted.

    A republic form of government is one where elected individuals represent the citizens and exercise power according to the rule of law under the Constitution.  In America, those representatives are democratically elected.  In a ‘direct democracy,’ the citizens directly deliberate and decide on legislature. When elected officials in a republic abrogate their responsibility, citizens often take matters into their own hands.  True democracy is ‘mob rule.’  Based on the recent civil unrest, the U.S. is looking more and more like a true democracy.  

      Some believe the United States has moved from a republic to an oligarchy.  In a study by two political scientists; Martin Gilens, (Princeton), and Benjamin Page, (Northwestern), they concluded the wealthy have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics.  Gilens and Page write; “When the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”  Gilens and Page are liberals and clearly had a predetermined outcome, but they are correct the wealthy are more engaged in politics than the poor.  But no oligarchy can survive mob rule.  The numbers just won’t work.  So how does America get back to a representative democracy?  How does the United States get back to the form of government the founders intended?  Three ways:

     First, the average citizen must actively engage in their government.  They have to do more than vote.  They must pay attention to what is happening all the time, not just every two years at election time.  That involves attending meetings, getting to know their elected officials, helping candidates, and contributing money.  The reason big money has taken over politics is because so few average people are engaged in the process.   

     Second, the American system of government must be taught to the next generation.  Most millennials have little knowledge of our system of government and the genius of the founders.  Pew Research, in a March 2020 poll, found two thirds of millennials want the Electoral College eliminated and the president be elected by popular vote.  They fail to not understand the EC is a fundamental principle of a representative democracy.  Eliminating the Electoral College will result in large states having more and more control.  The genius of the Electoral College is it gives  power to individual states and not just population centers. 

     Third, Americans must commit to a democratic republic.  The mindset to understand the importance of being involved in a republic is critical.  Without wide-spread commitment from individual citizens taking equity in their self-governing system of government, America will not survive.

     The U.S. Constitution’s first amendment guarantees the right of citizens to peacefully assembly, but not to destroy private or public property.  What we are seeing in America is mob rule because some elected leaders capitulate to a mob.  Until citizens hold them accountable at the ballot box, America’s system of government is doomed.

3 PRIMARY REASONS TO VOTE NO ON SQ#802!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

SQ#802 IS BAD FOR OKLAHOMA!

by Steve Fair

     State Question #802 will be on the June 30^th primary ballot.  It is an initiative petition supported by those who want to expand Medicaid program for low income Oklahomans whose income does not exceed 133% of the federal poverty level.  If passed, it would become a part of the state Constitution. 

     Oklahomans Decide Healthcare is the group supporting SQ #802.  They contend that expansion of Medicaid will make Oklahoma families heathier and the economy stronger.  The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs(OCPA) opposes SQ #802, partly because federal bureaucrats set the federal poverty level.  Governor Kevin Stitt opposes SQ #802 saying, “If SQ#802 passes, our state agencies will experience deep cuts because the ballot measure offers no mechanism to pay for it.”  Four observations:

     First, health care funding should not become part of the state Constitution.  That is the primary fishhook in SQ #802. There are those who support expansion of Medicaid who oppose having it into the state Constitution.  Having it in the Constitution forces the legislature to fund it, no matter what.  Bad idea.   

     Second, Oklahoma taxpayers can’t afford Medicaid expansion.  With the downturn in the oil and gas industry, gross revenue tax revenue is down.  Unemployment is up in the Sooner state and couple that with the pandemic, it is certain that other sources of revenue will be down as well.  Oklahomans Decide is wrong- putting more tax burden on hurting, struggling people doesn’t strength the economy, it cripples it.

     Third, the federal matching funds are not guaranteed to be there forever.  OCPA says,  "Oklahoma would be obligated to provide medical assistance to adults at or below 138% of the federal poverty level regardless of whether Congress continues to pay a large portion of the costs. Congress would dictate how much money actually leaves Oklahoma’s treasury.”   Congress currently appropriates the federal matching funds for Medicaid, but they can quit at any time.  With SQ #802 in the Oklahoma state Constitution, Oklahoma taxpayers will have to pick up the slack if Congress quit funding the expansion

     Fourth, it is still unclear how many are eligible and will sign up if Medicaid is expanded.  State health officials estimate that 220,000 will be eligible and 180,000 would sign up.  In several states, the actual numbers who signed up for Medicaid expansion was much higher than the estimates and created funding issues. 

     According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), healthcare spending in the US is estimated to grow by 5.4% annually for the next eight to ten years.  Projections indicate health care spending will cost an estimated $6.2 trillion by 2028.  Much of that is due to the aging population in the US. Healthcare will continue to be a topic of discussion for the foreseeable future and Medicaid expansion may be necessary in Oklahoma, but SQ #802 is not the way to do it.

    Vote no on SQ #802 for the following reasons: (1) Healthcare funding should not be a part of the state Constitution, (2) It is an unfunded mandate.  It doesn’t increase taxes to pay for the expansion- it just mandates it, (3) Oklahoma taxpayers simply can’t afford it.   

It's about POLICY, NOT PERSONALITY!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

RELEVANCE SEEKERS ARE IRRELEVANT

by Steve Fair

      On Saturday, the New York Times reported former President George W. Bush, former Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice along with Utah U.S. Senator Mitt Romney will not support President Donald Trump’s re-election.  The article implied former Speakers of the House Paul Ryan and John Boehner will not vote for Trump.  They also said that up to four other GOP U.S. Senators plan to not support the president’s re-election.  Four observations:

     First, a vote isn’t about personality- it’s about policy.  When President Bush and the others oppose the president of their own Party, they reveal their lack of commitment to the conservative movement.  Trump’s abrasive personality is polarizing, but as Dr. Gerald Beasley once about an abrasive elected official: “We send them up there to vote.  Little else matters.  Watch how they vote, not what they say.”  That is great advice.  It’s about the cause, not the person.

     Second, a vote is always the lesser of two evils.  Until Jesus Christ is on the ballot, we are always voting for a fallen human being.  In every election, voters make a choice between the lesser of two evils.  They should base their decision on which candidate they believe will govern or implement policies most closely aligned with their convictions, values and political philosophy.   President Trump has appointed more conservative judges, cut taxes and cut government regulation more than any president- Republican or Democrat- in modern history.  Vice President Joe Biden has said he will do the exact opposite- raise taxes and appoint liberal judges.   Trump’s personality and may be course and blunt, but his policies are conservative- Biden’s will be liberal. 

     Third, this fight/conflict is really over economic globalism.  Every Republican mentioned in the Times article believe all the countries of the world should collectively operate as one system.  President Trump has vocally opposed America being dependent on foreign manufacturing (much of which happened during the Bush presidency) and has encouraged manufacturing to return to the U.S.  

     Fourth, the rank and file Republican base remain behind Trump.  Even with the COVID-19 pandemic, the George Floyd incident and the protests, Trump supporters are firmly supporting the president.  That is the good news.  The bad news is Democrat conservatives, many of them union workers, who supported the president in 2016 are not as enthusiastic about Trump, but aren’t in Biden’s corner yet either.  With five months until the election, a lot can change- and will.

     When candidate Trump was running in 2016, he promised, if elected, to ‘drain the swamp.’  That meant he wasn’t going to go along to get along.  He vowed to be unconventional and to govern different than tradition dictated.  That is why he makes career politicians and bureaucrats nervous.  The Washington establishment, including many elected Republicans, have opposed his governing style and policies since his election.  No president in modern history has been criticized, critiqued, and condemned more.   

     The fact is, none of those Republican listed in the article have enough influence to sway the election to Biden.  They lose all creditability with conservative Republicans when they say the prefer Biden over Trump.  Conservative Democrats won’t listen to them either.  They have lost their relevance. 

PRAY GOD STARTS WORKING ON HEARTS!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

LAW ENFORCEMENT SHOULD POLICE THEIR OWN!

by Steve Fair

     On Memorial Day evening, an African American man named George Floyd died during an arrest in Minneapolis.  Four police officers were arresting him for allegedly trying to pass a counterfeit $20 bill at a deli.  According to police, Floyd resisted arrest and would get into the car.  Ultimately he was cuffed on the ground and Officer Derek Chauvin placed his knee into his neck.  A bystander recorded video on their phone and Floyd is repeatedly heard saying on the video he can’t breathe and begging Chavin to not kill him.  Chavin had his knee in Floyd’s’s neck for nearly nine minutes and did not remove it until the ambulance arrived.  Floyd was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital.  Charges of third degree murder have been filed against Chavin, who was fired the next day along with the three other officers.

     On Tuesday, peaceful protests were staged in Minneapolis, but since that time, they have escalated to violent and destructive protests.  Protesters have burned the Minneapolis 3^rd police precinct building, looted several businesses, including a Target store and according to The Minneapolis Star Tribune, an estimated 255 businesses have been vandalized or entirely destroyed in the Twin Cities area.     On Saturday and Sunday, protests sprang up at more than 100 cities across the world, including Oklahoma City and Tulsa.  In downtown OKC, two restaurants were vandalized.  All stories are like a pancake, there are two sides, but this incident should cause all Americans to be outraged.  Three observations:

     First, overzealous law enforcement should not be tolerated.  The deli manager called 911 and described George Floyd as drunk and trying to pay with a fake bill.  Floyd wasn’t threatening the deli manager, didn’t have a weapon, but it appears the Minneapolis police dispatcher sent four officers to the scene, including one(Chauvin) who has a history of complaints against him for overzealous enforcement.  Law enforcement leadership know there are some in their midst that ‘love the action’ and often will try to create some ‘action.’  Chauvin appears to be one of those and his superiors knew it.  By not dealing with him earlier, they bear some of the blame for Floyd’s death. 

     Second, two wrongs don’t make a right.  Peaceful non-violent protests are sometimes appropriate, but when thugs co-op a tragic event, use it as an excuse to loot and destroy private property, they do the cause harm.  Looting a Target isn’t protesting- it is larceny.  Torching a public building owned by taxpayers isn’t complaining- it is arson.  Tossing a brick through a plate glass window isn’t objecting- it is vandalism.  Destroying other people’s property is not peaceful assembly, it is a riot.

     Third, all Americans should be morally outraged by Floyd’s death.  Righteous indignation is anger fueled by divine or moral law.  Aristotle called righteous indignation a mean between envy and spite.  Believers can and should be angry over the exhibit of depravity and inhumanity on the video, but it should never lead to more violence- it should lead to thoughtful action to punish the evildoers, which in this case includes not only the four officers but those who left an overzealous officer on the street.

     America is a nation of laws and when laws are broken- by an overzealous police officer, a looter or an arsonist, that person should be punished.  God ordained human government to do just that- punish evildoers and reward those who do good.  Violent, destructive protests do nothing but continue the cycle of violence and destruction.  America, we can do better.  Pray God changes hearts.  

Target the CUTS! Across the Board Cuts are lazy governing!

 SINE DIE 2020!

by Steve Fair

     The Oklahoma legislature adjourned on Friday, passing about half the number of bills they usually do in a session due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Governor Kevin Stitt vetoed sixteen bills last year, but this year vetoed nineteen- ten of which the legislature overrode.  Five of the vetoed bills were authored by House Speaker Charles McCall, (R-Atoka).  Those bills passed both chambers with strong bipartisan support.    Before the legislature went sine die of Friday, the legislature overrode six of the vetoes.  Included in those were two bills dealing with rural broadband, a bill on matching funds for state universities and a bill that revises the process for renewing car tags online.  Both the governor and legislative leadership issued statements there were no hard feelings over the vetoes and overrides.  Three thoughts:

     First, the governor and the legislature need to get on the same page.  In Oklahoma, the governor proposes legislature and the legislature deposes it.  A lot of taxpayer dollars and time could have been saved if lawmakers and Stitt would have gotten on the same page.  Clearly, collaboration needs to improve.  In a state governed exclusively by Republicans, it’s not a sign of governing efficiency when the Republican chief executive is vetoing the GOP Speaker of the House bills.  Cooperation, communication and collaboration needs to improve. 

     Second, COVID-19 dramatically impacted this legislative session.  The number of bills passed was down.  In person committee meetings and personal interactions were non-existent.  Couple that with the governor’s attention on the pandemic, and you have a communication breakdown.  Some in the legislature believe that is why the communication between the lawmakers and he governor wasn’t as it should have been.  That may be true, but if COVID-19 is a long term challenge, all parties better step up their communication game.

     Third, the legislature and the governor got the constitutional mandated business done under difficult circumstances.  The legislature met less than 40 days in 2020- one third less than normal.  COVID-19 disrupted businesses, threatened health, and impacted tax revenue.  The state’s rainy day fund was tapped to fill holes, but there wasn’t enough to plug all holes and cuts were necessary. 

     Sadly, once again, ‘targeted cuts’ to state agencies was not done.  It was ‘one size fits all’ cuts to all state agencies again.  While across the board cuts are easier, it is not the right way.  Comprehensive performance audits of every entity that gets a dime of state tax dollars should be conducted and zero based budgeting should be implemented.  Agencies should justify every penny of tax payer dollars they receive.  Across the board cuts reward agencies who are bloated and inefficient and penalize agencies who are lean and efficient.  With the US economy on hold and a timeline to recovery uncertain, government needs to become more efficient and more streamlined.  Retailers are closing stores and moving to a digital online sales model, government should watch and learn.          

     In these troubling times, stay safe, lean on God’s unchanging hand and pray this pandemic will soon pass. 

If Democrats win Congress & White House, expect a Full Blown Assault on the 2nd Amendment!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

AN ANTI- RED FLAG LAW!

by Steve Fair

    Before the Oklahoma legislature adjourned on Friday, they passed Senate Bill #1081, an anti ‘Red Flag’ bill.  Authored by Sen. Nathan Dahm, (R-Tulsa) and Rep. Jay Steagall, (R-Yukon), the bill was signed into law by Governor Kevin Stitt on Saturday    The new law prevents Oklahoma cities and towns from enacting policies that would allow a court or other entity to restrict gun access to people who they deem to be an imminent danger.  The bill passed the House 77-14 and the Senate 34-9. “This bill would stop any action from the federal government or even from local or state authorities that would infringe on the Second Amendment rights of our citizens,” Steagall said.   The bill is said to be the first of its type in the nation.  Critics of the bill said it was unnecessary because Oklahoma municipalities are already prevented from engaging in gun control.  Two thoughts:

     First, gun control is a fundamental plank in the Democrat platform.  Their platform states: We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation. Their ‘reasonable regulation’ includes banning of assault rifles and more background checks.  So much for not infringing.  The Republican Party platform states:  We believe the 2nd Amendment and all the rights guaranteed by it should enable law-abiding citizens throughout the country to own firearms in their homes for self-defense.  Perhaps there is not an issue where the two major Parties differ than on the Second Amendment. Joe Biden, the presumptive Democrat nominee says he would push to have gun manufacturers held accountable when one of their guns is used in a mass shooting.  No word on whether he would hold knife manufacturers to the same standard.    

     Clearly the second amendment is under attack across the country.  It is sad to say but in conservative Oklahoma, there are mayors and city councils who would attempt to implement gun control if they could.  We have seen several examples of ‘heavy handed’ mayors overstepping their bounds by restricting liberty of their citizens above and beyond the recommended guidelines of the CDC during the COVID-19 pandemic.      

    Second, many Americans don’t understand the Second Amendment.  It wasn’t placed in the U.S. Constitution for hunters.  It was placed there to allow the citizens of the United States to own firearms for self-defense and to insure the security of a free state. Some believe only the military should have guns, but the Second amendment specifically intended to allow everyday citizens the ability to protect themselves and their country. We as citizens are guardians of the Second Amendment. No one should be neutral on the Second amendment.  It is our duty to uphold it.  The Second amendment protects the rest of the Bill of Rights.  Younger Americans need to understand the importance of the Second amendment.

     Voters need to recognize the importance of the November elections.  If Democrats gain control of the Senate and win the White House, ‘Red Flag’ laws will be enacted.  The Second amendment will be under attack.  The problem with Red Flag laws is who determines who presents imminent danger?  Is an imminent danger someone that disagrees with their post on Facebook?  Is it someone who goes to church three times a week?  What are the red flag triggers?  Red Flag laws clearly violate due process, a guaranteed constitutional right.  Thanks to Governor Stitt, Senator Dahm, and Representative Steagall for proactively addressing the issue.

DEMOCRATS IN OKLAHOMA ARE OFFICIALLY LIBERAL!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

GRADING MY OWN TEST

by Steve Fair

     I always loved grading my own tests in school.  It always seemed both Johnny(my seatmate) and I got better grades when we graded our own than when the teacher made us exchange tests for grading.  The recent ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court on a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters that removed the requirement for notarization of voter absentee ballots and allows voters to simply ‘self-notarize  reminds me of those days grading my own test. 

     Election Board Secretary Paul Ziriax said, “This decision effectively leaves Oklahoma without a means to verify that the person who signs an absentee ballot affidavit is the same person to whom the ballot was issued.” 

     The Oklahoma legislature got busy this week and quickly passed SB #210.  Authored by Senate President Pro Tempe Greg Treat, (R-OKC) and Speaker of the House Charles McCall, (R-Atoka), SB#210 reinstated the notary requirement for the November general election.  It also requires absentee voters in the June 30, 2020 primary election to include a photocopy of their photo ID with their ballot.  No notary is required.  Waiving the notary requirement for the primary due to the pandemic seems unnecessary and could promote voter fraud.Three thoughts:

     First, Oklahoma has one of the best election processes in the country.  The optical- scan voting machines utilized in the Sooner state provide a voter-verifiable ‘paper trail,’ direct recording electronic machines do not.  Voter fraud in Oklahoma is rare, but it does happen.  Ten years ago, an Adair county man, known for being a Democrat activist, was charged with two felony counts of false affidavit in voting registration and two felony counts of false notarization of an absentee ballot.  He pled nolo contendere and received a three year deferred sentence.  He was essentially charged with signing the names of two voters on absentee ballots.  If the legislature had not acted as quickly as they did, verification of who is voting by absentee would have been next to impossible and the possibility of voter fraud would have been dramatically increased.

     Second, the League of Women Voters is a liberal organization.  Originally founded in 1920 to help women gain the right to vote, it has politically moved far from that mission.  The League now publicly opposes voter ID laws, supports abortion, universal health care and gun control.  Their motivation in opposing notarization of absentee ballots threatens ballot security.  Every person who is eligible should be afforded the right to vote, but insuring the identity of the person casting that vote is essential to election integrity. 

     Third, Democrats in Oklahoma are officially liberal.  The vote on SB #210 was along Party lines, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing Oklahoma voters to sign their absentee affidavit in front of a notary. The days of ‘conservative’ Democrats in Oklahoma is gone.  The elected Democrats in the Oklahoma legislature are philosophically in line with the national Democrats when they in lock step oppose a common sense bill like SB #210. 

      Ronald Reagan famously said, “Trust, but Verify.”  That is what SB#210 does.  It outlines a process in which voters can cast their ballots by absentee and verification the voter did the casting of the ballot.  Why would anyone oppose Voter ID?  Because they want to grade their own test.