Sunday, March 1, 2020

AMERICA HAS BEEN MOVING TO A MIXED ECONOMIC SYSTEM!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

There is No Free!
by Steve Fair
     Economics is the science that deals with the production, distribution and consumption of goods and services.  Adam Smith was an 18th-century British philosopher renowned as the father of modern economics.  There are generally four accepted economic systems.  A ‘traditional’ system, which is generally found in third world countries, often use barter systems of exchange and lack modern technology .  The second system is a ‘command’ economic system.  In the command system, a large part of the economy is controlled by the government.  The former USSR used the ‘command’ system and it was the core of the communist philosophy.  The third system is the ‘market’ economic system, which is often called capitalism.  In a capitalist system, firms and individuals acts in self-interest how their resources are allocated, what goods get produced and who buys the goods.  The fourth system is the ‘mixed’ economic system, which is a combination of a market economy and the command economy.  France and India use a mixed system.  One characteristic every system has is that ‘free does not exist.’  Someone is always paying the bill.  Free doesn’t exist, but many people fail to understand that fundamental principle. Two points:

     First, there is a deficit of the study of economics.  Fewer young people are exposed to the most basic of economic study. In 2014, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni(ACTA) surveyed 1,098 colleges and found only 3.3% required an economics class to be granted a degree.  That accounts for why Bernie Sanders can pack out venues with young people promising ‘free stuff,’ which doesn’t exist in any economic system. 

     Sanders describes himself as a Democrat Socialist.  His critics call him a Communist. The difference is a matter of degrees.  Under Communism, most property and economic resources are owned and controlled by the government and not individual citizens.  Under Democrat socialism, all citizens share equally in economic resources as allocated by the government.  In both systems, getting ahead is hard to do.

     Second, the free market system is not perfect, but it does reward those who take risks and work hard.  To most people that is appealing, but to those who want to sponge off others, it isn’t.  In a capitalism system, there can be a wide disparity is the distribution of wealth.  Sanders is right about the wealth disparity in the US widening in recent years, but that has been caused by government interference into the system, not the system itself. 

     In recent years, America has moved closer to the ‘mixed’ economic system.  The Affordable Care Act has the government controlling healthcare, which is over one sixth of the nation’s economy. Tax cuts with no cut in spending  has resulted in an increasing national debt.   

     French economic writer Frederic Bastiat described the difference between a bad economist and a good one“the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen.”      
     America’s economic policy the last 30 years has been reactive, short term, and not proactive.  Government should get out of the regulation business and allow the free market to work.  But always remember-there is no free.

Monday, February 24, 2020

Past Criminal Acts should be considered in Sentencing!

Weekly Opinion Editorial
DON’T SIGN 805!
By Steve Fair

     On Saturday, I was approached by a nice looking young man in a Wal-Mart parking lot asking me if I was a registered voter in Oklahoma.  “I am, are you?” I asked him.  “I am registered to vote,” he replied.  “Do you live in Oklahoma?” I asked.  “Yes, I do- in Norman,” he said.  “Would you consider signing criminal justice reform initiative petition #805 and by signing would help get it on the November ballot?” he asked.  “No, I replied.  I am familiar with #805 and do not agree with what it would do,” I said.  “Thank you and have a nice day,” the young man said as he scurried across the parking lot to a couple. Three observations:
     First, I like to see young people engaged in the political process, no matter what their political leanings.  I suspect the young man was being compensated to carry a clipboard and gather signatures, but perhaps not.  We need more young people involved in the political arena, and those who will learn the most will do the ‘boots on the ground’ work necessary to get candidates elected and issues on the ballot. 
     Second, I appreciate that Oklahoma has an initiative petition process.  Less than half the states in the U.S. allow their citizens to initiate legislation through the petition process.  The number of signatures is tied to the total votes cast for governor in the last gubernatorial election.  To amend the state constitution, petitioners must gather 178,000 signatures in a 90 day period.  If they get 95,000, they can have a state statue considered on the ballot.  It is a process that allows the citizen voters in Oklahoma to go around the legislature if they want.  That happened with SQ #640, which most legislators hate, but without it, Oklahoma citizens would be paying more taxes.
     Third, State Question #805 is not right for Oklahoma.  If approved by the voters and became law, it would end ‘enhancement sentencing.’  Enhancement sentencing is an option available to prosecutors in which they take into account a defendant’s criminal history and if a pattern of offenses are found, stricter punishments are sought.
     An example of the impact of SQ #805 would have if enhancement sentencing is eliminated is the driver of the pick-up that plowed into the Moore High School track team that killed three.  If #805 would have been law, the act would not have been considered a violent and the driver would have not faced as severe charges.    Michael Freeman, the father of Rachel Freeman who was killed in the incident, said habitual offenders shouldn't catch a break and that their punishment should grow with each conviction. “Are we going to focus on public safety, or are we going to focus on the prison population?” Freeman said.  That is an excellent question.
     “These are crimes like domestic violence, like child trafficking, like hate crimes, animal cruelty, repeat drunk drivers, drunk drivers who hit and hurt someone causing great bodily injuries. We should not ignore a person who continues to engage in habitual criminal behavior and not consider that when we seek sentencing,” Stephens County District Attorney Jason Hicks says.
     So when those nice young people seek you out to sign #805,politely decline and attempt to educate them on the ‘unintended consequences’ of letting habitual criminals get by with lesser sentences.  It means they are loose in our communities, not locked up where they belong.

Sunday, February 16, 2020

Platforms Show Striking Difference on 2nd Amendment!

Weekly Opinion Editorial
THE 2ND IS LOCAL!
by Steve Fair

     The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.  Under attack from liberals in recent years, who believe gun control will reduce mass shootings, the second amendment has become a topic of debate.  Virtually all the Democrat presidential candidates favor gun buyback programs, a ban on assault weapons, and universal background checks to purchase a gun.  But those who would confiscate weapons from law abiding Americans may find it hard to accomplish if local law enforcement won’t cooperate.
     In May 2013, the Carroll County, Maryland Board of Commissioners passed a resolution declaring the county a ‘second amendment sanctuary.’  In part the resolution stated: "The right to keep and bear arms is assumed to be a natural right from God and the Second Amendment is merely a restriction on government, it says to government, 'stay away.'"  In the six years since, many counties in states across the U.S. have followed that lead.  Last week, it was Oklahoma’s turn.  First, Logan County Sheriff Damon Devereaux, in a signed resolution, vowed no public funds will be used to enact policies that restrict the Second Amendment rights of Logan County, OK (Guthrie) residents.  The next day, Stephens County, OK (Duncan) Sherriff Wayne McKinney did the same.  Since that time, a dozen additional county sheriffs across the Sooner state have followed their lead and declared their county a second amendment sanctuary.  Critics claim the declarations are purely for optics and are meaningless, but that is not true because the second amendment is a local issue. Three observations:
     First, passing the resolution sends the message law abiding citizens are count on local law enforcement not being the tools to grab their guns.  Law enforcement who publically takes a stand for the second amendment is standing up for those they are protecting and that is a good thing.
      Second, county commissions should pass the resolution.  That adds teeth!  The sheriff is the top law enforcement officer in the county, but they can’t unilaterally declare a county a second amendment sanctuary.  The commission is the ruling body in the county and they should follow their sheriff’s lead.
     Third, there us a striking difference between the two major political Parties on the second amendment.  The Democrat platform states: “We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation.”  The Republican platform states: “We uphold the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, a right which antedated the Constitution and was solemnly confirmed by the Second Amendment.”  Quite a difference.
      At the Stephens County GOP county convention last week, delegates unanimously passed the following resolution: Recognizing the U.S. Constitution grants citizens the right to keep and bear arms, we the duly elected delegates of the Stephens County support the designating of Stephens County, OK as a Second Amendment sanctuary county.  All politics is local and the second amendment is no exception.
 

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Iowa, SOTU, & Acquittal Dominate Headlines!

HISTORICAL HEADLINES!
by Steve Fair

     Last week’s news headlines were historic.  On Monday, Iowa held their quadrennial presidential caucuses.  Both the Republicans and Democrats use the caucus system in Iowa.  A caucus is an indirect election. Instead of registered voters going to their normal polling place and casting a secret vote in a voting booth, in a caucus system, registered voters meet and publicly vote and the results determine the number of delegates each party's national convention will receive from their respective state. 
     There are strengths and weaknesses in both the presidential primary and caucus systems.  Some GOP activists in Oklahoma would like for the Sooner state to return to a caucus system.  Tuesday morning’s headline wasNo Results Available from Iowa.’  Using an app to count votes that appeared to fail, the Iowa Democrat leadership could not provide final results until late in the week, which means Iowa may not be going first in the presidential process in four years. 
     After 72 hours, it appeared former South Bend, IN Mayor Peter Paul Buttigieg, 38, and Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I-VT) tied in the Hawkeye state.  Former Vice President Joe Biden finished a distance fourth.  After Buttigieg and Sanders’ victory and Biden’s poor showing, James Carville, a well-known Democrat operative said: “The turnout in the Iowa caucus was below what we expected.  Trump’s approval rating is probably as high as it’s been.  This is very bad and now it appears the Party can’t even count votes. The purpose of a political party is to acquire power. All right? Without power, nothing matters. We are talking about the wrong things,” Carville concluded.
     On Tuesday evening, President Trump delivered what could be his best speech ever at the State of the Union.  Under indictment by the U.S. House with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sitting directly behind him, Trump stuck to the teleprompter and masterfully presented the case for his re-election.  But Pelosi dominated Wednesday’s headline after she ‘ripped up’ a copy of Trump’s speech.      
     Thursday’s headline was Trump Acquitted,’ after Wednesday afternoon’s vote by the U.S. Senate vindicated the president on two counts; abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.  The vote was along Party lines with only Sen. Mitt Romney, (R-Utah), voting with the Democrats on the abuse of power charge.  Three lessons from this week’s news banners:
     First, it is past time to rethink Iowa kicking off the presidential cycle.  Rotate the starting state around.  And if Democrats can’t count votes, how are they going to govern?
     Second, Pelosi’s stunt was beneath the dignity of her office and will probably not appeal to the swing voters Democrats need to win close elections.  So much for going high when your opponent goes low.
     Third, the impeachment/trial process is political, not legal.  The Democrat leadership knew they could not remove Trump from office when they started this boondoggle, but they plowed ahead anyway.  
     Will Rogers said, “All I know is just what I read in the papers, and that’s an alibi for my ignorance.”  This week news readers had historic headlines to keep them ignorant.

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Democrats running for President should recluse themselves for Wednesday's vote!

Weekly Opinion Editorial
VOTE WILL NOT END CIRCUS!
by Steve Fair

     The vote to remove or acquit President Trump on charges he withheld aid from Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into Joe Biden’s son has been scheduled for Wednesday February 5th.  After voting to not call witnesses on Friday evening by a vote of 51-49, with two Republicans (Romney and Collins) joining all 47 Democrats, the impeachment of Trump is about to come to an end.  Senator Charles Schumer, the minority leader of the Senate said: “To not allow witnesses or documents in an impeachment trial is a grand tragedy, one of the worst tragedies that the Senate has ever overcome. America will remember this day — a day when the United Senate did not live up to its responsibilities, turned away from truth and instead went along with a sham trial,” he said.  On Monday, closing arguments are scheduled to begin.  On Tuesday, the president is scheduled to deliver the State of the Union address.  President Trump will still be under the cloud of impeachment, which seems bizarre, but this whole process has been bizarre.  Four thoughts
     First, the real ‘sham’ trial was in the U.S. House.  President Trump wasn’t allowed to call witnesses in the very partisan process.  The president’s defense team wasn’t allowed to question the Democrat witnesses.  The outcome was predetermined.  That is a real tragedy.
     Second, Senators Romney and Collins (both Republicans) should pay the price for voting with the Democrats.  Romney represents conservative Utah and isn’t up for reelection until 2024, but his constituents should force him to explain/justify his ‘no witnesses’ vote.  Collins represents middle of the road Maine, so her vote will not be as big of a political issue in her home state, but she is up for reelection in 2020. Collins, 67, is running for her 4th six year term and faces little opposition in the primary, but the Democrat Speaker of the House in Maine is running against her in the general.  Cook Political Report has moved the race to a ‘toss up’ from solidly Republican status.   
      Third, when the trial vote is taken on Wednesday, expect at least two Democrats to join the Republicans to acquit. Senators Sinema, (D- AZ), Manchin, (D-WV), Jones, (D- AL), and King, (I, ME) are the ones most likely to join Republicans to acquit, but expect all Republicans to vote to acquit.  Two of the senators represent states President Trump carried in 2016.   
     Fourth, there are four U.S. Democrat Senators running for President who should recluse themselves from voting on Wednesday.  That is highly likely to happen, but it should.  Senators Bennet, (D-CO), Klobuchar, (D-MN), Sanders, (I-VT), and Warren, (D-MA) are all seeking the Democrat Parties nomination.  Voting on whether their political opponent can remain in office and stand for reelection or be removed and sent home just isn’t right.
     Don’t expect Wednesday’s vote to end the circus and send the carnies home.  They will dismantle the tent, haul it to the next town, set up and start the process again.  And the people’s business will go to the back burner.

Sunday, January 26, 2020

Get the Impeachment over with and get on with the people's business!

Weekly Opinion Editorial

VOTERS ARE THE REAL JURORS!
by Steve Fair
     A Fox News poll released on Sunday showed half of Americans want President Trump impeached and removed from office.  Those polled broke along partisan lines with 81% of Democrats favoring removal and 84% of Republicans of those polled saying he shouldn’t be removed.   53% of Independents believe he should be removed. Interviews were conducted January 19-22, 2020 among a random national sample of just 1,005 registered voters.  75% of those polled were contacted by cell/25% by land line. Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of +/- percentage points. The poll was conducted by Beacon Research , a pollster out of Boston.  The irony is the poll showed 55% of those polled believe America’s economy is doing well and credit President Trump with that result.

     The circus that is called the impeachment continues in the U.S. Senate with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle working cross word puzzles, falling asleep and communicating on smartwatches while Democrats present the articles.  Sen. Richard Burr, R-NC, distributed ‘fidget spinners’ to GOP colleagues on the Senate floor before Thursday’s proceedings.  Few Americans are watching with less than 9 million tuning in to view this historical event.  For those who didn’t get to see what went on, here’s a recap:

     First, Democrats spent three days presenting arguments that President Trump abused power and obstructed Congress.  Over and over they emphasized the POTUS put his own interests over the United States. “You can trust he will do what’s right for Donald Trump. He’ll do it now. He’s done it before,” Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead impeachment manager, said. “He’ll do it for the next several months. He’ll do it in the election if he’s allowed to.”

     Second, on Saturday the president’s lawyers began their defense by arguing that Democrats are trying to interfere with the 2020 election by removing Trump from the ballot for doing ‘absolutely nothing wrong.’  Pat Cipolline, White House Counsel, said there is no case against the president and the Democrats are damaging democracy by undermining the will of American voters, who voted for Trump.  “For all their talk about election interference, they're here to perpetrate the most massive interference in an election in American history,” Cipollone said in his opening remarks to the Senate.

    Third, the Senate is heading toward a vote on Democrat demands for testimony from top Trump aides, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former National Security Adviser John Bolton.  It would take four Republican senators to join the Democrats to seek witnesses, and so far it appears the numbers appear lacking.
      On Sunday, Sen. James Lankford, R-OK, criticized the Democrat House impeachment managers for dragging out the trial and trying to get the Senate to act as a special counsel and investigate the president.  He also admitted Republicans want to get the trial over as soon as possible and get back to the people’s business. “They(the Democrats) wanted to move as fast as possible, and now they want to slow down the trial as much as possible in the Senate. That’s just a very odd political strategy for them, more than a fact-finding strategy,” Lankford said.  The fact is the impeachment is a political stunt that has hurt the country.  Voters are the real jurors and they will deliver their verdict in November.