Weekly Opinion Editorial
BIDEN’S
TIGHT ROPE!
by
Steve Fair
Last week, U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Stephen Breyer announced his retirement from the high court at the end of the
current court session. Breyer, 83, was
nominated to the SCOTUS by former President Bill Clinton and has served 28
years. He has been a reliable liberal
vote on the court.
Breyer’s retirement gives President Joe
Biden his first SCOTUS nomination. Biden
has vowed to nominate the first Black woman justice to the court. Biden’s short list reportedly includes three
federal court of appeals judges, a federal district court judge, a law
professor and a civil rights attorney.
Three observations:
First, there is no margin for error with
this nomination. The U.S. Senate confirms
the president’s nominee. The Senate is spilt
50 Ds/50Rs. Vice President Harris casts
the tie breaking vote, which gives Democrats majority control. A power sharing agreement between Senators
Schumer and McConnell, has each Senate committee with equal numbers of Democrats
and Republicans. Before the vote comes to the floor, the
nominee must be passed by the judiciary committee. If Republicans hold the line, they could hold
up a nominee in committee and prevent a floor vote.
In 2016, former President Obama nominated current
Attorney General Merrick Garland to the high court, but the nomination never
got to the floor because Republicans controlled the Senate. In 2022 the Democrats in theory control the
Senate, but in practice the chamber is evenly spilt. That means President Biden must include
Republicans in his discussion on a nominee and not alienate any Democrats. With two Democrat Senators recently voting
with Republicans to block some of Biden’s signature legislation, it makes
getting a nominee confirmed a challenge for Biden. He is walking a tight rope to get a nominee
confirmed before mid-terms.
Second, affirmative action shouldn’t be a
factor in the nomination. The nomination
is Biden’s sovereign decision, but he should be looking for the most qualified
candidate, no matter their race, sex, creed or color.
Senator Roger Wicker, (R-MS) said: "The irony is that the Supreme Court is at the
very same time hearing cases about this sort of affirmative racial
discrimination (college admissions) while adding someone who is the beneficiary
of this sort of quota."
Senator
Lindsay Graham, (R-SC) disagrees with his colleague. “Put me in the camp of making sure the
court and other institutions look like America.
Affirmative action is picking somebody not as qualified for past wrongs. Michelle Childs is incredibly qualified.” Graham told
Politco.
Graham is promoting Judge Michelle Childs,
a U.S. District judge in his home state of South Carolina. Childs, 55, rulings have been reliably
liberal and she is listed on Biden’s short list. Graham is the on the judiciary committee
(Wicker isn’t) and he could be the key vote to getting a nominee through
committee. “She’s one of the most decent people I’ve ever
met. I cannot say anything bad about
Michelle Childs. She’s an awesome
person,” Graham said.
Likeability
and temperament are important traits, but the job of judiciary committee
members is to vet potential justices on how they will rule, not grade their
personality. Would Childs rule based on
a literal interpretation of the intent of the writers of the Constitution? That is highly unlikely based on her rulings
in South Carolina.
Third, Biden is being urged to act with a
sense of urgency. Democrats are worried because
Biden has a record of missing deadlines.
Former Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle, (D-SD), said, “You don’t
know what circumstances may bring, whether it’s the loss of a member(Senator)
or somebody crossing other to the other Party. That should be very much on
their minds right now.” An illness,
death or retirement of a member could derail a nominee being confirmed.
In 2020, Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed
within a month of nomination, but Republicans controlled the U.S. Senate. Biden’s nominee will necessarily require at
least one Republican on the Senate judiciary committee to vote with the
Democrats to move to a floor vote.
Senator Graham may have as much to say who
the SCOTUS nominee is as the president. Graham’s
spotty, unreliable, inconsistent record on conservatism has been disappointing
to say the least. Expect it to continue
through this tight rope process.
1 comment:
"Graham’s spotty, unreliable, inconsistent record on conservatism has been disappointing to say the least."
What, where, when, why, and how?
You just brush this off as a given, but personally I would like to know more about your opinion on Graham. No, not the track record of his votes in the Senate that I can research online. More specifically, is it your opinion that Graham should be a hardline, far-right conservative on every issue brought to his desk, or would you not be opposed to the idea of a Republican congressman speaking positively of a liberal? You assert that his record is disappointing, but why?
Post a Comment