TO WRITE OR NOT TO WRITE
by Dr. Forrest L. Keener

I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

(2 Co 5:9 - 11)

*****

It is not my purpose to expound the above verses, but to call attention to the words, “I wrote, ... but now I write.” The conjunction “but” clearly implies some kind of change in, or qualification of, Paul’s first instruction as compared to the next one. I expect there is no indication of error in the first writing, but rather that additional information he had gained, or a consideration of the possibility that his first instruction might be misinterpreted or misapplied, caused him to feel the need for further qualification of his original instruction. I suppose that some such modification is necessary for everyone who by writing puts themselves on record of what they have said, unless of course, they are quoting the very words of God, which cannot be improved. Nineteen years ago, a good man, and a good friend of mine, a good Bible student, and a fine godly preacher, gave me some personal advice. I think it was unsolicited, nevertheless, he said “Brother Keener, never write anything down, when you can communicate it audibly. There are too many men who will purposely misunderstand, and use your own words against you. He was not speaking of all writings, but communications such as letters, which concerned controversial issues, or issues which might well become controversial in the future. However, I have since then become convinced that the truth of this will, to some extent, apply to anything we write down.

*****

I have been thinking lately how we as preachers, and by no means we alone, will make more of an issue over what we consider to be the errors, even of our favorite writer’s words, than we will make of their truth. Consider how we do this concerning the writings of such men as Gill, Henry, Pink, and on I could go. I have noticed how good men will labor in the defense, or explanation of an issue, and their critics will totally depart from the intended issue to find fault with incidental details, that neither prove nor disprove the particular issue under discussion. I have been poorly and ignorantly writing for more than forty years, and find it to be very demanding, indeed, exhausting work. I have gotten some good compliments from many people, from time to time, and often received assurance that my work had helped someone to better understand some principle or doctrine. This is, of course, gratifying. But as thanks for my efforts, I have also been criticized, lied about and lied to. I have lost friends, and have been called names that the critics probably could not even define. This, of course, makes us wonder at times, why should we who write even go to the trouble?

*****

The answer is simple. Almost all of the education that any of us has received comes through the writings of someone else. From the first little books our parents and siblings read to us, to the hundreds of volumes we read and digest during our entire life’s education, everything that can be read must have been written. It is true that today we have, and are developing, many other forms of communicating data. Nevertheless, most of that is coming from data originally saved on the printed, therefore written, page. Consider the lifetimes of hours spent writing, and recopying our Holy Bible. Consider the untold value of recorded history. Consider the mathematical and geographical information that has been passed on to us, without which business as we know it could not exist. I could go no with other examples but the point is obvious.

*****

Let us pause frequently to thank the men and women of the past who have contributed to our lives, if only a little by each. They were historians, philosophers, theologians, researchers, architects, geographers, mathematicians, professors, novelists, musicians, etc. Some were like Gill and Surgeon, who each contributed hundreds of volumes, and others scribbled only a few lines, which finally became invaluable threads, connecting facts of history. None of our lives could be what they are, if those who have written had not written. So let us who can write, even if ever so poorly, leave behind us what we can. It may improve a life, or help preserve a soul saving truth. It is my prayer that my tiny contribution within this activity may improve and enhance a life, and above all, that it may guide some soul to faith in Jesus Christ.

*****

Dr. Forrest L. Keener is a Missionary/Evangelist out of Sherwood Baptist Church in Oklahoma City, OK. He can be reached by email at flkeener@cox.net.

2010

ELECTION

PREDICTIONS

I predict Republicans will gain the following in the Tuesday mid-term elections. In addition, I predict Jason Hicks will be elected District Attorney in District 6 and the GOP will SWEEP the statewide elections in Oklahoma.

57- U.S. House Seats
8- U.S. Senate Seats
4- Oklahoma State House Seats
3- Oklahoma State Senate Seats

Weekly Opinion/Editorial

by Steve Fair

Tuesday is Election Day. While the results of the midterm elections are not known yet, pundits are predicting a great night for the GOP, but on Wednesday the governing and the ‘accountability’ begins.
*****
As General Douglas McArthur said, “No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.” The responsibility of being a citizen in this country and state requires vigilance. We must work to insure those elected yesterday are held accountable. Lots of promises and pledges were made during the campaign cycle. Most of the time, those guarantees and oaths are forgotten by elected officials as soon as the votes are counted. That’s because the citizenry at large fail to pay attention and hold them accountable by staying informed. Most people in the US mistakenly believe their only responsibility in the political process is to vote.
*****
But as James Bovard says, “Voting is no substitute for the eternal vigilance that every friend of freedom must demonstrate towards government. If our freedom is to survive, Americans must become far better informed on a day to day basis.” Thomas Jefferson said, "No nation is permitted to live in ignorance with impunity."
*****
Staying informed requires personal sacrifice. Instead of just listening to Fox News, it requires citizens to actually do personal research on what their elected officials are really doing. It may require voters to attend meetings on nights that are inconvenient or give up some of their recreational time to stay informed. Bottom line; If American citizens stayed consistently informed, the political progress in American would be dramatically reformed, taking power away from political donors and campaign consultants giving it back to the citizens.
*****
Currently, on the average, it costs upwards of over one million dollars to run for a U.S. House seat. Just twenty years ago, the amount was half that. It costs over two hundred thousand dollars to run for the Oklahoma State Senate. With that much money required to run for office, candidates have three choices. They can fund a campaign themselves, which would allow only the rich to seek elective office. They can appeal to a broad small donor base, which requires a lot of time and work or they can appeal to a small number of big donors who often want more than just good government from their ‘investment.’ If the public as a whole ‘stayed informed,’ campaigns would require less money. Most of the expensive advertising would be unnecessary because the ‘informed’ electorate wouldn’t need to be educated on the candidate’s position.
****
When candidates buy TV, radio, print, direct mail, to ‘inform’ the public on their positions, the message is designed to get votes, not inform. Often the real positions of the candidates don’t square with what they really believe. Inconsistency and hypocrisy are staples on the campaign trail and unfortunately the citizenry have come to expect it. What the general public fails to recognize is by not ‘staying informed,’ they have created the current political process they claim is so corrupt.
*****
Paying attention to what is happening in your government for ninety (90) days every other year just before an election isn’t vigilance. Voting every time the polls are open is not in and of itself vigilance. Being a faithful Party worker or campaign volunteer doesn’t necessarily make you vigilant. Being vigilant requires you remain watchful and alert. It means you are on the alert for danger and pitfalls on what your government may be doing or not doing. Vigilance requires commitment and sacrifice. Staying informed is a critical component of vigilance.
*****
As Wayne LaPierre of the NRA says, “Freedom is never an achieved state; like electricity, we’ve got to keep generating it or the lights go out.” The elections are over- now the work begins for not just those who will be elected Tuesday, but also for the vigilant.

THE SECOND AND FINAL DEBATE!

A critique and scoring of the Tulsa debate

Congresswoman Mary Fallin and Lt. Governor Jari Askins squared off in their second and final debate tonight in Tulsa. After brief opening statements, they fielded thirteen(13) questions from a group of media panelists. Most of the questions were not issue oriented and therefore a waste of time, but the fact is most people who watch or listen to a debate are not swing voters anyway. Here is how I scored it tonight.

Question #1
Asked the importance about the historical election of Oklahoma's first woman Governor, Fallin said gender shouldn't matter and Askins used her time to cite her experience.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****
Question #2
Asked about State Question #755- the one about Oklahoma judges not following Sharia Law, Fallin stated clearly and definitely, she supports passage of 755- didn't want to make the same mistake twice. Askins supports passage of 755 as well.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****

Question #3
Asked why Oklahoma has so many women in prison per capita, Askins said it's because Oklahoma doesn't spend enough on community based counseling. Fallin said it's because we are a poor state and need jobs and economic development. Askins' answer was the classic liberal answer to everything- throw government/taxpayer money at the problem.

ADVANTAGE: FALLIN

*****
Question #4
Asked about a recent report the Oklahoma State Teachers Retirement fund is the third worst in the country, Askins said “ We need to fix it before it hurts our bond rating.” Fallin said, "We need to keep the promise we made to the participants in the plan." While neither gained a clear advantage with their answer, Askins has a creditability gap on this issue. She was in the legislature for twelve years when the Democrats were underfunding the retirement systems and she was in the Democrat House leadership.

ADVANTAGE: FALLIN

*****
Question 5
How can Oklahomans get better physically fit? Why are we so unhealthy?

I hate FOOD POLICE questions- could be because I sell food- but nevertheless both begin to talk about 'government mandated' education of mothers on how to feed and care for their families. Both cited good programs (Regional Food Bank's Kids backpack program and Farm to school program), but Fallin missed an opportunity to tie this back to her JOBS theme. Fallin's answer was too liberal to give her an advantage on this question.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****

Question #6
Will Mary Fallin endorse Sarah Pallin for President?
Stupid question and has nothing to do with the issues in a campaign for Governor of Oklahoma, but it was asked anyway. A better question would have been WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR IN 2008 FOR PRESIDENT? Fallin evaded the answer, citing the names of friends she has who are considering a run at the White House. Askins said she hadn't met Pallin, but would go grizzly bear hunting with her if invited. She talked about her turkey hunting experience and how she bagged her first gobbler this year.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****
Question #7
Is funding common education a worthy goal?
Askins answered this question well. She said, “Oklahoma should never strive to be average, but to be excellent.” There is just one problem- the reason Oklahoma is at the bottom in education is because Askins and her Party(Democrat) failed to get money to the classrooms during their "100 year reign of terror" in Oklahoma. Fallin fumbled this question, but eventually managed to say she favored administration sharing. Neither breached the "C" word (Consolidation). Fallin appeared to not be prepared for this question.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****

Question #8
How do we get Oklahoma moving forward economically?
Fallin hit her three key points out of the park on this question. "I will focus on reducing our tax burden, educating our workforce and right sizing government," Fallin said. "I will create a governor’s task force on what holds Oklahoma back economically." Fallin said. Askins cited the success of the Quality Jobs Act and how important it is to have seed capital available for people who want to start a business.

ADVANTAGE: FALLIN

*****
Question #9
Another stupid non- issue oriented question. Stating that Governor Henry will be remember as the 'Education Governor," the question was; "How do you want to be known as Governor? Askins had a very good answer. "I want to be known as the Governor who focused on children," she said. Referencing her meetings with Speaker Designate Chris Steele, (R-Shawnee), Askins said she has always had a keen interest in protecting and helping children. Fallin used her time to go back to her three point message, however this was a question that required sensitivity and Fallin fumbled with her answer. "I want to be known as the Governor who gave children and all citizens of Oklahoma a better future." Fallin said. It was a direct slap at Askins response. Askins was specific, clear, concise and believable. On this question, Fallin came across as a politico.

ADVANTAGE: ASKINS

*****
Question #10
Citing Askins TV ads about her conservative credentials, Jari was asked-"What is your greatest conservative accomplishment?" This was perhaps the one opportunity that Askins had to 'knock it out of the park.' She failed! "I pushed legislation to create a trust to save the tobacco money instead of spending it like a lot of other states did," Askins said. While that is somewhat conservative, Askins missed to chance to tout her pro-life and pro-gun stances, but she didn't. Fallin said, "To me a conservative is a person who not only talks the talks, but walks the walk." Fallin cited her 96 rating by a conservative organization, her pro-life, and pro-gun stance. A very awkward moment for Askins.

ADVANTAGE: FALLIN

*****

Question #11
Asked if they would support a change in Medicare matching funding in Oklahoma and would you put it to a vote of the people, Fallin was evasive and unclear. “We need to keep our fees low, because they are passed on.” Fallin said. Askins was more prepared for this question, citing several issues with the State's Medicare matching funding and concluded by clearly answering the question and stating, “I support putting it to a vote of the people.”

ADVANTAGE: ASKINS

*****
Question #12
The questioner rambled on about how important the Tulsa area and NE Oklahoma is and how they haven't seen Governor Henry (who cares) in Tulsa much and finally asked "What is your style of leadership?" “Coming from Duncan, Oklahoma, I don’t favor OKC or Tulsa- I understand the issues that both metro areas face.” Askins said. “I think a Governor needs to be available. I have paid a lot of attention to Tulsa." Fallin said. The answer to this question should never change the mind of an undecided voter- a waste of time.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****

Question #13
Instead of a question, this panelist editorialized about all the hurting in Oklahoma. "What can you do in the first 100 days in office that will help improve all the hurting in Oklahoma," she asked? Fallin knocked it out of the park on this answer. She said, “The best thing I can do is to create the best business climate possible in Oklahoma." Askins' answer was equally good. “There is no silver bullet to solve our problems in the first 100 days. I believe working with the legislature on a balance budget early will be best thing I can accomplish in the first 100 days," Askins said. Problem with Jari's answer is when she was in the legislature and Governor Keating (a Republican) was in office, the Democrats in the legislature(and she was in leadership) did not WORK with the Governor, so while the answer was good, her creditability is lacking.

ADVANTAGE: FALLIN

*****

CLOSING STATEMENTS
Fallin hit her three(3) points: Jobs, educating Oklahoma's workforce, and right sizing government. She also said she would send a signal to Washington that we will not tolerate unfunded mandates. Askins reminisced on how she came to the decision to run for Governor and said she ran because she is a 'decision maker.' "You must be able to lead and to discern," Askins said. "I will build a team that looks like Oklahoma. I will make the tough decisions," Jari concluded.

ADVANTAGE: TIE

*****

FINAL TALLY
TIE:SEVEN(7)

FALLIN: FIVE(5)

ASKINS: TWO(2)

Weekly Opinion/Editorial

STATE QUESTIONS AND JUDGES
by Steve Fair

Voters usually have less information about the state questions and the judges on the ballot than they do about the elective races. This year’s ballot has eleven (11) state questions and six(6) judges.
*****
The proposal getting the most attention is SQ #744, which if approved, would tie common education funding to a ‘regional average’ of Oklahoma’s surrounding states. If approved, this proposal would result in increased taxes and/or reduced funding to other state agencies. The problem with SQ #744 is it does not provide a funding mechanism- only a spending one.
*****
You have probably seen the pro 744 TV commercials that imply by cutting state legislator’s perks and benefits the money to fund 744 would be there. That is simply not true. If all of the 149 legislator’s perks and benefits were given to common education it would only provide three days worth of funding. Passage of 744 would be devastating to other state agencies and take funding decisions out of Oklahoma legislators hands and give it to the surrounding state’ lawmakers. In my opinion, of the eleven state questions SQ 744 is the only one that should be voted down, the others should be approved. Now a quick look at the judges.
*****
Up until 1966, Oklahomans elected judges in partisan statewide elections. Voters knew the judge’s Party affiliation, convictions and values. Judges had opponents and campaigned just like the other statewide elected officials. Using the excuse that elections cost the judges a lot of time and money and was undignified for the judiciary, they effectively lobbied the Oklahoma legislature to place a State Question on the ballot. That proposal was approved by the voters and amended the State Constitution to the current ‘judicial retention’ system. Since Oklahoma implemented the judicial retention system, not one Oklahoma appellate judges has failed to be retained. Obviously, the lack of information on their performance in office has given the judges an advantage at the ballot box.
*****
The truth is most voters don’t know anything about the judges. Bear in mind that every one of the six judges were appointed by a Governor. It stands to reason they reflect the values, views and opinions of the Governor who appointed them. Keep that in mind when you cast your vote on whether to retain or remove.
*****
There are six judges on the 2010 retention ballot. The two Oklahoma Supreme Court justices up for retention are Steven Taylor and James Winchester. There are four justices on the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals on the ballot- Deborah Barnes, Doug Gabbard, John Fischer, and Larry Joplin. Governor Blackjack Henry appointed all but Winchester and Joplin. Winchester was appointed by Governor Keating, Joplin by Governor Nigh. In my opinion, all but Winchester should be removed.
*****
Finding information on the judges is difficult. None of them published a flyer of how they voted on key rulings, or a statement of their judicial philosophy. In my opinion, that should be the very least they are required to do. That would help voters make an informed decision on these important offices. I have published a brief bio of each of the six judges on the blog http://stevefair.blogspot.com/search?q=here+come+the+judges. The Norman League of Women Voters has published the six judges’ answers to some survey questions on their website. You can access that information at http://norman.ok.lwvnet.org/2010_judicial_retention.html .
*****
Voting gets underway this week in Oklahoma. According to the US Census Bureau, the most common excuse people give for not voting is they didn’t have time. Oklahoma has made it more convenient for voters to cast their ballot in recent years. You can vote in-person absentee on Friday from 8am to 6pm, Saturday 8am-1pm, or Monday 8am-6pm at the County Courthouse. On Tuesday November 2nd, all regular polling places are open from 7am-7pm.
*****
One of my favorite quotes about voting comes from John Quincy Adams who said, “Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

JONES VISITS ALL 77 COUNTIES AND COURTHOUSES

Momentum has Jones on verge of victory!

State Auditor and Inspector candidate Gary Jones(pictured aboved @ the Roger Mills County Courthouse near the 'Records Vault') says he feels that he is on the verge of victory after visiting all 77 counties and county courthouses in Oklahoma. In early October, Jones set a goal of visiting every county courthouse before the November 2nd election. Craig County in Vinita was the first visited by Jones and on Thursday Roger Mills County in Cheyenne became the seventy-seventh (77th).

*****

“People across our state know the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector is one of the most important elected offices in our state,” said Jones. “I believe it is critical that we have an Auditor that is trustworthy and honest. Nowhere is it more important to have that trust than in the rural parts of our state, especially our county courthouses.”

*****

Jones is known for his tenacity in rooting out corruption and making government more efficient. “I’m running because as a citizen of our great state I have uncovered more fraud and corruption in state government than the last three Auditors combined,” he said.

*****

Jones believes tax dollars should be spent efficiently and free of corruption and waste. “If there is waste or corruption, taxpayers lose,” he said.

*****

Jones has picked up several important endorsements during his campaign, the biggest being from United States Senator Tom Coburn, who is also known as the taxpayers’ watchdog.

*****

In addition Jones is receiving support from county officials in all 77 county courthouses. “I have support from sheriffs, county clerks, court clerks, treasurers, assessors, district attorneys, and county commissioners. No one works closer with the auditor’s office than county officials. Those that know the most about the State Auditor are overwhelmingly supporting me. I am proud to have their support,” said Jones. "I have traveled every corner of Oklahoma, from Boise City in the Panhandle to Idabel in far Southeastern Oklahoma, from Miami in Ottawa County to Hollis in Harmon County, and all points in between. I have been listening to citizens and those individuals elected to serve their communities. County officials are concerned that it has been as long 4 or even 5 years since their county has been audited. They don’t feel that they are getting their questions answered and they aren’t getting the support they need to get their jobs done."

*****

While virtually all county officials have praised the help they receive from the field and support staff of the auditor’s office, they don’t hesitate to point out a problem exist in room 100 at the state capitol, the Auditor and his senior staff.

*****

As a former Comanche County Commissioner, Gary Jones understands the importance of being able to get accurate advice in a timely manner to aid elected officials and their employees to follow the law as they work to serve the citizens of their respective counties. Jones also understands the importance of getting audits done promptly to protect the taxpayer’s interest and ensure that elected officials and their employees are following the law.

*****

Gary Jones is running because he’s always had a sense of purpose, determination and the ability to focus on getting the job done. “I’m running because I believe we must have someone who has dedicated his or her life to doing what is right for the citizens of Oklahoma. I’m running because no one will outwork me and no one will be more responsible to taxpayers of Oklahoma.” said Jones

http://bretburnsda.com/thenumbers.htm

Last week, Bret Burns ran an ad in the Chickasha paper claiming he has personally handled over 34,000 cases in his 18 year career. The person behind bretburnsda.com has done the math and found that would be next to impossible unless Burns is super-human. You can read the entire article at the link above, but here is one excerpt.

*****

"If we were to believe Bret's claims that he has personally handled 14,000 felonies and 20,000 misdemeanors over his 18 year career... That would mean 34,000 cases total. There are 52 weeks in an average year, with 5 working days, for an average of 260 days. For 18 years, that's 4,680 days. That would mean that Bret would have been handling 7.264 NEW CASES every single day he worked for 18 years!"