Weekly Opinion Editorial
RIGHT TO WORK HAS BEEN GOOD FOR OKLAHOMA!
by Steve Fair
Last week Michigan, the birthplace of the United Auto Workers union became America’s 24th right-to-work state. It sounds bizarre but Michigan joined Indiana, which passed right-to-work legislation in February, to become the second right-to-work state in the heavily unionized Midwest.
The Michigan legislation
will prohibit workers from being forced to pay mandatory dues to labor unions
in order to gain employment. Without
compulsion to pay union dues, union membership, revenue, and strength decline. In other words, when a worker is given a
choice, a significant number choose to not join the union.
The labor
unions in Michigan reacted with violent
protests, even storming the capital building in Lansing. Union educators walked out of
schools and Democrat state senators walked out on the final vote. Union workers and the Democrats believe the
transition from a "closed shop" state to a right-to-work state will
kill the unions in Michigan. They may be right. This is the second defeat to Michigan's organized
labor interests in two months.
The
first defeat came when Michigan
defeated a state question on the general election ballot that if it had passed
would written collective bargaining into the state constitution and outlawed a
right to work law. Proposal 2 was
defeated 58% to 42%. According to
Republicans in Michigan,
Proposal 2 was defeated because the unions had outlived their usefulness and
have deviated from their original purpose.
Many unions now have become powerful special interest/lobbying groups
rather than true representatives of workers' rights.
On
Monday, before the state legislature passed and the Governor signed the right
to work law, President Obama went to Michigan
to campaign against the bill. He said, "These so called right to work laws,
they don't have to do with economics -- they have everything to do with
politics. What they're really doing is trying to talk about the right to work
for less money." The president
went on to say that strong unions build a strong America. Understand that two thirds of union workers
vote straight Democrat so it makes sense the president would support his base.
But
an important question to ask is why are union states passing Right-to-Work
laws? It’s probably because union
workers are tired of losing their jobs because employers refuse to operate,
relocate or expand in a non right to work state. Michigan
has been losing population and jobs for over twenty years and right to work
states are doing better than those who are not right to work.
Mark
J. Perry, from the American Enterprise Institute, says that in the past three
years right to work states have created four times as many jobs as states where
they have closed union shops.
Oklahoma passed right-to-work in 2001. During the campaign for the ballot
initiative, I wrote a brochure that was widely distributed across the state
entitled, “The Grapes of Wrath continues…”
At that time college graduates were fleeing Oklahoma
to Texas and
other states for better paying jobs.
Companies were refusing to relocate and expand in the Sooner state
because we didn’t have right to work. We
were exporting our most precious resource- our kids and grandkids.
Critics
of right-to-work in Oklahoma
said passage wouldn’t make any difference.
They said business didn’t care about right-to-work and passage would
hurt Oklahoma. Has passage of right to work made a
difference in our state? Consider the
following:
Since the passage of right
to work, Oklahoma’s
ranking among the states in per capita income has risen from 47th to
32nd. According to the US
Commerce Department, per capita income in the Sooner state is now $37,679. In the ten years since Oklahoma passed right-to-work, the state’s
personal income growth is second in the country.
Forbes magazine ranks Oklahoma as the eleventh best state in America to do
business. Site Selection, magazine that evaluates states and cities for their
business enviroment, declared Oklahoma
to have the 13th best business climate in the country. Before passage of
right to work, we ranked at or near the bottom.
Right to work has worked in Oklahoma-
it has worked well.
Contrary
to President Obama's statement to his union supporters about how right-to-work
is not directly related to economics, it’s clear right-to-work states do better
than those without it. Right-to-work
laws allow employers the freedom to hire non-union workers and negotiate
contracts with more than one party.
I predict that Michigan will look back in ten years and be grateful to their legislature for having the courage to pass right-to-work. If they do as well as Oklahoma, it could be what stopped the exodus from the Wolverine state.
No comments:
Post a Comment