Weekly Opinion Editorial
CONGRESS IS
THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY!
by Steve Fair
The Supreme Court will
take up two very important cases in the final two weeks of the current
term. The first is King vs. Burwell which will
determine whether the Affordable Care Act lawfully gave the Internal Revenue
Service authority to extend tax-credit subsidies to coverage purchased through
exchanges established by the federal government under Section 1321 of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
It is generally conceded the ACA didn’t expressly address the federal
exchanges, but was implied. In oral
arguments March 4th, seven of the nine Justices seem to have staked
out their position, leaving Justices Roberts and Kennedy the swing votes. This case made its way to the high court
because two lower courts disagreed in their appellate opinions. Oklahoma Solicitor General Patrick Wyrick says King vs. Burwell is a simple case. “King v. Burwell presents a straightforward question of statutory interpretation, the sort judges decide routinely and readily. The case is a symposium-worthy blockbuster not because of the question presented, but because of the statutory vehicle that delivered us that question,” Wyrick says.
But because this case is about the Affordable Care Act, Wyrick sees it being transformed into a more complicated and partisan case than it should be. “A false narrative is being created: that resolution of the case in the challengers’ favor would require the abandonment of all basic principles of textualism. This way, a loss can be blamed on politics, rather than on the true culprit: the IRS’s decision to execute the law it wishes Congress had enacted, rather the law Congress actually enacted,” Wyrick says. A decision on King vs. Burwell could come as early as Friday morning.
The second major case is Obergefell vs. Hodges. This is the same-sex marriage case. It will rule as to whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and does it require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state? Oral arguments were presented before the court April 28th for 2 ½ hours. Justice Kennedy appears to be the swing vote again. A decision is expected as early as Friday.
If same-sex marriage is ruled to be the law of the law, it will attempt to define something God has already defined. In the Garden of Eden, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. No matter what nine black robed judges say marriage is between one man and one woman and no Supreme Court ruling will change that.
These cases highlight a situation all
Americans need to consider: the SCOTUS has more power than any other branch of
government! The Supreme Court for a long
time — indeed, since 1803 when it declared it could void statues or laws — has
claimed for itself the ultimate authority to decide what the Constitution
means. Much of the debate is whether the Constitution is to be
interpreted literally, just as it was written, or whether it is meant to be a
living, breathing document that changes over time. There are a number of
examples where the court has overturned laws and ‘legislated from the bench.’
Many of these decisions have been
after voters have overwhelmingly made a decision and the courts decided to
overturn the decision of the people. And
it is not just the SCOTUS. Right here in
Oklahoma, the State Supreme Court has overturned legislation and ruled State
Questions unconstitutional. An activist judiciary
is a real threat to self-government.
The intent of the founders of our
country was for the legislative branch to be the most powerful with the
Executive branch being the weakest. Evidently
President Obama doesn’t believe that because on the White House website, it
says, “Each branch of government is balanced by powers in the other two coequal
branches.” Co-equal? Not right! The legislative branch is the
closest to the people, and that is why it was made the most powerful branch of
government. Article 1 of the Constitution
gives explicate authority to the legislative branch to impeach the judicial and
executive branches. Just because
Congress lacks the political will to do it doesn’t mean they don’t have the
constitutional authority to do it. Of
course, if the case went to the SCOTUS, they would likely rule an impeachment
of a Supreme Court Justice unconstitutional.
No comments:
Post a Comment