Weekly Opinion Editorial
DOUBLE WHAMMY!
by Steve Fair
In
2020, Congress set aside approximately $3 billion dollars to a help stabilize
education funding. They created the
Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund. Oklahoma received $39.9
million in GEER funds. The federal
grants, not surprisingly, came with complicated compliance requirements.
Last week, Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector (SAI) Cindy Byrd
released the results of a federally mandated audit of the GEER funds Oklahoma
received. Byrd found two programs set up
by the state had not complied with the federal requirements. Bridge the Gap, a program that helped low-income
families with education related costs, was misused by 20% of the 5,000 families
that received the funds according to the SAI. Byrd said the total misspent in Bridge the Gap
was $1.8 million.
Two thirds of those getting money from Stay in School, a program that
helped low-income families with tuition costs, was said to be questionable. Byrd estimated $6.5 million of tax dollars
were misused in the Stay in School program.
“Every federal grant comes with very strict requirements which the
State of Oklahoma agrees to follow,” State Auditor Cindy Byrd said. “Any person in change of managing federal
grants needs a certain level of proficiency because the compliance regulations
are very complicated.” The full
audit report is now posted on the Oklahoma State Auditor & Inspector’s
official website: www.sai.ok.gov. Three
observations:
First, who was supposed to be ensuring federal compliance? According to the federal Department of
Education (DOE) website, the governor in each state must designate a State
Agency or administer the GEER funds through their office. Governor
Stitt chose the latter. Two years ago,
the governor hired a consulting firm to monitor the GEER funds. Taxpayers paid the firm $325,000. Byrd’s conclusion from the audit was the consultant
had not done their job. She said the Sooner
state ‘dropped the ball on compliance and oversight,’ on the GEER funds.
The blame for the non-compliance belongs at the feet of the
governor. In a press release, Oklahoma Speaker of the
House Charles McCall said as much. The
Speaker didn’t name the governor in the presser, but the inference is there. Attorney General Drummond weighed in on the
audit, saying the people empowered to administer the GEER money did not have
the qualifications or knowledge to do the job.
Second, Oklahoma statutes require competitive bids. The SAI found the digital wallet vendor was
given an $18 million dollar contract without going through the competitive bid
process. Circumventing or avoiding the exercise
to request proposals from multiple parties might be quicker and more efficient,
but it is not legal. This administration
was earlier criticized for bypassing the bid process in the awarding of
foodservice/restaurant contracts at state lodges. Government is not like a private
business. The laws/rules can slow down
the process, but they are in place to protect the taxpayer and avoid misuse of
funds.
Third, the taxpayer is always the guarantor. If the federal government demands repayment
for non-compliance, John Q Public will pay the bill, not elected officials or
the incompetent amateurs they hired. In
this particular case, it’s a double whammy.
Taxpayers sent tax dollars to Washington for Washington to send back to
Oklahoma to be misused. Taxpayers then have
to pay back the misused money to Washington.
Confused?
GEER funding wasn’t sought by Oklahoma. The federal government insisted they were going to help the state, whether it was wanted or not. The federal money was grudgingly accepted, but once accepted, recognizing the strings attached was crucial. The lack of attention to detail could cost Oklahoma taxpayers.
No comments:
Post a Comment